Apology to the Poly Posters

[notyoueither]

Given the pending change of ownership at Apolyton

Wot?

[Asher]

Why not just come over to QuartertoThree?

Speaking of no integrity, QuarterToThree is the site that apparently posted the fraudulent Halo 3 review?

The site where YOU post? I've browsed the forums there, it's not a community for me. The people there are overly artistic vs scientific/technical and they don't seem to comprehend much of anything regarding the big picture of gaming. They are exceedingly polite, though, which is exactly why I don't post there. It's sickening.

[Aeson]

Funny, yes; relevant, no.

All the more reason to focus on it rather than the "relevant" subject matter of this thread.

[Asher]

Wot?

Oh, you'll see.

There will be changes...

[lord of the mark]

Speaking of no integrity, QuarterToThree is the site that apparently posted the fraudulent Halo 3 review?

The site where YOU post? I've browsed the forums there, it's not a community for me. The people there are overly artistic vs scientific/technical and they don't seem to comprehend much of anything regarding the big picture of gaming. They are exceedingly polite, though, which is exactly why I don't post there. It's sickening.

There are people there who actually code games for a living, I think thats quite technical enough. Amazingly they manage to get along with artsy folks without insulting them. In my experience most scientific technical type folks, do. If you think they don't comprehend gaming, you should post there and demonstrate your superior insight, they always respect insight.

And they definitely mock and tease. They do so with wit and humor, and fundamental good will, however, rather than brutality and boring name calling. I can see where that could be confusing.

[Asher]

There are people there who actually code games for a living, I think thats quite technical enough.

Name one actual game developer who posts there.

[Docfeelgood]

There are people there who actually code games for a living, I think thats quite technical enough. Amazingly they manage to get along with artsy folks without insulting them. In my experience most scientific technical type folks, do. If you think they don't comprehend gaming, you should post there and demonstrate your superior insight, they always respect insight.

And they definitely mock and tease. They do so with wit and humor, and fundamental good will, however, rather than brutality and boring name calling. I can see where that could be confusing.

True wisdom

[lord of the mark]

Name one actual game developer who posts there.

Brad Wardell

[Ben Kenobi]

So you're admitting that Asher was at FFZ before you - if anything you are guilty of stalking Asher.

As Asher himself admitted, he left the account dormant for several years before resurrecting the account again as 'volunteer firestarter' to harrass the members of FFZ.

Except he never gave me the option to play by the rules. That is the problem with people like you (LotM today) - the rules don't exist when you have a chance to get back at someone - indeed you seem to think it is your god given right or something to act like a total ****ing hyprocrite when it suits you. Morals? Ethics? Pah!

I am shocked with the hostility towards LotM, honestly. He has been calm and collected and people come into the thread simply to flame him. I'm honoured you would lump me in with a class act like LotM.

Secondly, why do you presume I would act in the same way as Chris if I owned a site of my own?

Third, his site, his rules. He wasn't willing to let you stay because of your previous posting history here. Can't say I blame him.

So you claim. Evidence?

Asher's testimony that he revived his account to troll FFZ members. Clearly the account by his own admission was dormant.

My facts certainly square up with the start portions of both of your accounts, actually.

Well it doesn't square up with the fact that Asher wasn't banned until after you and after Chris had owned FFZ for several years. Asher had a chance to participate by the rules, until it was apparent he wasn't interested.

I'm just making the point that just cos Asher admits he was banned for 'something' doesn't automatically mean that it supports your unsubstantiated claim...

Asher's already admitted that he revived his account, and that he came on FFZ to troll. Given his history here, it seems to me pretty clear to the folks at poly why he got banned, and why he didn't last. He admits to being unaware if it was a perma-ban because of sour grapes, which is a perfectly understandable reaction. He makes the statement that the site 'sucks' without him, again sour grapes, etc. etc. etc.

Just read his statement, you'll see everything you need to see there.

[notyoueither]

Oh, you'll see.

There will be changes...

The beans. Spill them.

[Asher]

Brad Wardell

Did you intentionally pick one person you know I dislike and have ranted about in OG before?

Nice job.

GalCiv 2 was massively overrated and not very successful.

[lord of the mark]

Did you intentionally pick one person you know I dislike and have ranted about in OG before?

Nice job.

GalCiv 2 was massively overrated and not very successful.

Speaking of lazy. Took a minute or so to find this.

http://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/galactic-civilizations-ii-twilight-of-the-arnor/credits

[Asher]

As Asher himself admitted, he left the account dormant for several years before resurrecting the account again as 'volunteer firestarter' to harrass the members of FFZ.

I DID NOT ADMIT THIS YOU PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

Holy ****! You have no shame! You're lying about what's going on IN THIS VERY THREAD as well.

I am shocked with the hostility towards LotM, honestly. He has been calm and collected and people come into the thread simply to flame him.

His very first post in this thread was contrarian and provocative. You just can't comprehend it due to your obvious mental deficiencies.

Asher's testimony that he revived his account to troll FFZ members. Clearly the account by his own admission was dormant.

fkjqwjlerchqutycv134tyc73

My TESTIMONY is the reason I was EVER on FFZ was to be a troll. EVER. Before you even posted there. It was a ridiculous site full of overly sensitive American "patriots" like Chris.

I did not "REVIVE" the account just to troll people, but when I am banned from Apolyton I always post on sites I am less active on (this includes Counterglow, CivFanatics, and for a while FFZ).

IT DOES NOT MEAN I "REVIVED" AN ACCOUNT. IT DOES NOT MEAN I CAME THERE TO STALK YOU. IT MEANS I WAS BANNED ON APOLYTON SO I WAS POSTING ON OTHER SITES INSTEAD. Again, as the folks on Counterglow. Am I "stalking" them whenever I post there when I'm banned on Poly?

Christ.

Well it doesn't square up with the fact that Asher wasn't banned until after you and after Chris had owned FFZ for several years.

I was banned before then, too. Not that you would know, SEEING AS I WAS AT THAT SITE BEFORE YOU EVER WERE.

Asher's already admitted that he revived his account, and that he came on FFZ to troll.

NO I DID NOT! YOU PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

Ming, this is the tenth time I've asked but can you please do something about Ben's OBVIOUS and PERSISTENT slander?

[Asher]

Speaking of lazy. Took a minute or so to find this.

http://www.mobygames.com/game/window...-arnor/credits

Uhh, what the **** LOTM?

I know who he is! I just said I didn't like him! Why the hell did you link me to mobygames? WTF.

[Asher]

The beans. Spill them.

Not in public or on this site. I'd get my sources in trouble.

We can talk at CG...