Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Happy Birthday, Republicans!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Happy Birthday, Republicans!



    March 20, 1854
    Republican Party founded


    In Ripon, Wisconsin, former members of the Whig Party meet to establish a new party to oppose the spread of slavery into the western territories. The Whig Party, which was formed in 1834 to oppose the "tyranny" of President Andrew Jackson, had shown itself incapable of coping with the national crisis over slavery.

    With the successful introduction of the Kansas-Nebraska Bill of 1854, an act that dissolved the terms of the Missouri Compromise and allowed slave or free status to be decided in the territories by popular sovereignty, the Whigs disintegrated. By February 1854, anti-slavery Whigs had begun meeting in the upper midwestern states to discuss the formation of a new party. One such meeting, in Wisconsin on March 20, 1854, is generally remembered as the founding meeting of the Republican Party.

    The Republicans rapidly gained supporters in the North, and in 1856 their first presidential candidate, John C. Fremont, won 11 of the 16 Northern states. By 1860, the majority of the Southern slave states were publicly threatening secession if the Republicans won the presidency. In November 1860, Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected president over a divided Democratic Party, and six weeks later South Carolina formally seceded from the Union. Within six more weeks, five other Southern states had followed South Carolina's lead, and in April 1861 the Civil War began when Confederate shore batteries under General P.G.T. Beauregard opened fire on Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Bay.

    The Civil War firmly identified the Republican Party as the party of the victorious North, and after the war the Republican-dominated Congress forced a "Radical Reconstruction" policy on the South, which saw the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution and the granting of equal rights to all Southern citizens. By 1876, the Republican Party had lost control of the South, but it continued to dominate the presidency until the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.

  • #2
    How far they have come.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment


    • #3




      It is amusing that they started as a Northern Party in light of today.
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, is there really much in common between the Republican party of 1854 and today, other than both stand for a stronger central government with more control over our everyday lives?
        <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
        I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

        Comment


        • #5
          It is amusing that they started as a Northern Party in light of today.
          They were a western party. Still have most of the western states.
          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

          Comment


          • #6
            Well, is there really much in common between the Republican party of 1854 and today, other than both stand for a stronger central government with more control over our everyday lives?
            Isn't that Obama? I think you have your parties mixed up.
            Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
            "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
            2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

            Comment


            • #7
              Both parties are for a stronger central government, as far as I can tell. They just want different things out of that central government.
              <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
              I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

              Comment


              • #8
                Both parties want strong central governments when they control the central government, federalism when they control the state government, and weak government when they're out of power.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't think the Democrats ever really are for federalism, in or out of power; and the Republicans are only for federalism in certain ways that benefit their [unrelated-to-federalism] agenda. I consider a party to be for a stronger central government if it supports such to any significant degree, thus my earlier statement.

                  For example, I'd support the states' right to pass laws (and by 'pass laws' I mean, to do whatever the **** they want, free of federal interference) regarding abortion, gay marriage, teaching evolution to children, to some extent drugs [that is partially a federal issue re: trafficking, and partially a state issue re: legal to possess/grow/etc. I support CA's right to legalize Marijuana use/growing/distribution in-state, but the Fed's right to arrest anyone crossing state lines with it; and the complexities of federal enforcement might blur the lines a bit.] I doubt you'd find very many officials of either party willing to agree with that statement in its entirety.

                  I don't necessarily think some states would do things I agree with on the matter, of course, but I think they should have the right to have a stupid, high population if that's what said population wants (or, whatever). I don't think Kansas' teaching of creationism, or California's recognition of gay marriages, has a significant impact on the other state [so long as California doesn't marry Kansas residents, which they oughtn't be able to]. I'd also support a loose interpretation of the clause requiring Kansas to acknowledge Calif. marriages, as a result of that [they shouldn't have to recognize things they don't permit]. I think not deciding these things on the federal level is good for the country; except in the case of significant infringement on fundamental rights [and sorry, MrFun, gay marriage doesn't cut it there in my book, regardless of the fact that it probably should be legal, it's not a significant infringement on fundamental rights, and I'm utterly uninterested in debating that in this thread or any other], ie 1964 civil rights act etc., it's better for the states to come to their own decisions on these matters over time.
                  <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                  I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have great admiration for the Republican party of the past - the party in its early years, when it stood for basic human equality (on principle of opposing extension of slavery with others going further in seeking its abolishment).

                    The only Republican president in our country's history I admire is Abraham Lincoln. Ulysses S. Grant made for a great war general but in many ways, not a good president (although he did help crack down on the Ku Klux Klan).
                    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Not Teddy Roosevelt?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        What about ol' Rough and Ready?
                        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Teddy Roosevelt believed in American imperialism (darkies are incapable of self-rule).
                          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                            Teddy Roosevelt believed in American imperialism (darkies are incapable of self-rule).
                            He'd have conquered a lot of countries if he believed that.
                            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              @ Zkribbler.

                              What about Coolidge?
                              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X