Bibi B?

[OzzyKP]

http://israel.kieskompas.nl/clearuser/

Here's an interesting test.

This one actually seems much more accurate then the political compass. It says that the party closest to me is Likud.

Cool find.

My top three for Security are:
Meretz 83%
Balad 80%
Labor 80%

My top three on economics are:
Kadima 70%
Israel Beiteinu 68%
Labor 67%

My top three on religion are:
Ra'am-Ta'al 90%
Meretz 80%
Hadash 80%

Overall my top three are:
Labor 72%
Meretz 70%
Kadima 70%

I didn't answer any of the party leader questions, I don't know enough about them individually to answer.

It is odd though, on the chart, the Greens & Kadima were always the closest parties to my marker. But when you look at the numbers the Greens aren't close to me. Also, I just noticed when analyzing the results, it said that the question of capitalism vs. socialism, the Greens were completely capitalist. Is that accurate?

Some questions seemed biased or tricky to answer. Like "Eliminating Palestinian terrorists in populated urban areas should be avoided" I've got no trouble eliminating the terrorists, but I do have a problem trying to eliminate them with air strikes killing lots of civilians. The question should have clarified the tactics used. Plus there shouldn't be a forced choice between a strong military (which I favor), and the peace process (which I also favor). The question, of course, is how the military is used.

[rah]

There should be real election results coming soon, not the exit poll crap. Let's see what actually happens.

Those crappy exit polls seemed to be dead on.

[Imran Siddiqui]

They were off by 1 on Kadima, so they were biased!!1!!

[Ben Kenobi]

Those crappy exit polls seemed to be dead on.

Indeed, but the actual results > exit polls.

And I've never seen them err on the other side (ie, overestimating Likud).

[Ben Kenobi]

Some questions seemed biased or tricky to answer. Like "Eliminating Palestinian terrorists in populated urban areas should be avoided"

I said I completely disagree with that statement because 'populated urban areas' includes gaza. I really don't see any other solution. Give civilians a chance to leave the area, and then have at it.

Plus there shouldn't be a forced choice between a strong military (which I favor), and the peace process (which I also favor). The question, of course, is how the military is used.

I think the peace process should be used to it's greatest extent, but you maintain the military in case conflict arises. You don't do one or the other, but you do both. There are some parties that are doves and others that are hawks.

[OzzyKP]

Exactly. Which is why it was a dumb question.

[Alinestra Covelia]

Just so you know, this thread title translates into Chinese as "vulva vulva nose".

If you hadn't put the question mark at the end, it would have translated as "vulva vulva vulva" which would have prevented me from posting this picture: