Question about gays and lesbians.

[SlowwHand]

Oh, jeez. I saw you had posted and I had such high hopes for a voice of reason. I see you've gone over to the dark side.

[Zevico]

I have a question: Who. Freaking. CARES.

[Darius871]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
Why are straight boys so afraid of other men's penises?

Who said anything about "afraid"? We simply don't find the sight of sweaty, smelly ball-slapping all that appealing in a sexual context. It's pretty ugly in fact. That doesn't mean we cover our eyes in a communal shower, tape black boxes over pictures in biology textbooks, etc.; those remain outside a sexual context and are therefore kosher.

Anyway, timex's detailed analysis sums it up better than I ever could. However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken.

[Docfeelgood]

Seems to me that people who pick on gays are not well-adjusted with there own sexuality.

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Darius871


Who said anything about "afraid"? We simply don't find the sight of sweaty, smelly ball-slapping all that appealing in a sexual context. It's pretty ugly in fact. That doesn't mean we cover our eyes in a communal shower, tape black boxes over pictures in biology textbooks, etc.; those remain outside a sexual context and are therefore kosher.

Anyway, timex's detailed analysis sums it up better than I ever could. However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken.

If you would have said..Otherwise, everyone on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken then one could call spot on

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Docfeelgood
Seems to me that people who pick on gays are not well-adjusted with there own sexuality.

Good Point Doc


Totally unexcusable behavior, I dont care if you call yourself a Christian or not, if your a Heathen or not or if your just normal Wiglaf Poly People, abuse, be it Physical,mental or emotional, applied direct or insuinuated, is not acceptable

GT

[Darius871]

Originally posted by Docfeelgood
Seems to me that people who pick on gays are not well-adjusted with there own sexuality.

Who here has been picking on gays? We're just trying to clarify the intricacies of ManLaw for the uninitiated.

[Darius871]

Originally posted by Grandpa Troll
If you would have said..Otherwise, everyone on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken then one could call spot on

Well, only about half were on the official "down list" at least. If some guys were having their fun off-roster it's news to me.

[Timexwatch]

Originally posted by Docfeelgood
Seems to me that people who pick on gays are not well-adjusted with there own sexuality.

I certainly agree This thread is certainly not a case of that! People should be free to move as far to either side on the sexuality spectrum as they want.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Timexwatch


I certainly agree This thread is certainly not a case of that! People should be free to move as far to either side on the sexuality spectrum as they want.

[Q Classic]

Originally posted by Darius871


Who said anything about "afraid"? We simply don't find the sight of sweaty, smelly ball-slapping all that appealing in a sexual context. It's pretty ugly in fact. That doesn't mean we cover our eyes in a communal shower, tape black boxes over pictures in biology textbooks, etc.; those remain outside a sexual context and are therefore kosher.

Anyway, timex's detailed analysis sums it up better than I ever could. However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken.

I'm disappointed.

Not one crack about seamen?

[Timexwatch]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles



I'm disappointed.

Not one crack about seamen?

Wouldn't a joke about sodomy and the lash be more appropriate?

[Darius871]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles



I'm disappointed.

Not one crack about seamen?

As in, seamen in a crack?

[MrFun]

No! I say we recycle the old jokes about the Dick and the Bush!

[Blaupanzer]

Originally posted by Darius871
However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken.

One man sucking another man's anything is behavior generally characterized as "gay." Sailors (and other military folks) do not get off that easily. And yes, I am a veteran with time in a warzone.

I have come more and more to the conclusion that almost everybody is bisexual. How much much that shows depends on the person's self-image and personal reflection of what that person thinks society will think. Someone earlier labelled this sociatal sensitivity as "fear" and activated the macho of almost every male on the board. Still, if you tried sex with same sex and liked it, you are a little bit homo. Don't let it fluster you. Since the 1960's most people are willing to acknowledge these experiences in selected private settings or in public. An encounter of this kind appears to be almost universal.