I'm halfway into a bottle of Capn Morgan and...

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse


a) I thought Oncle waw a fakequebecois (french transplant to quebec)

b) I thought you ware a filosofizer as well. What are you, then?

Nope, I'm real Québécois.

[Darius871]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse


I had a diatribe written, but I am restricting myself to those who ask for my opinon. The only person I would move up here is Krill, and as was previously stated my opinion of him was low due to limited experience with him. Furth er experience has increased his stature greatly.

Richelieu might also move up sluightly.

Oh the rest of that list is just fine, but that doesn't explain why Ben Kenobi was in the middle quintile...

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris


Nope, I'm real Québécois.

Some of us try not to hold that against you.

[Ben Kenobi]

All right. If nobody else is interested right now I will continue this tomorrow (as long as it's still open),

I believe I asked some time ago.

[LotC]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi


I believe I asked some time ago.

You're not worth many peoples' time BK. Hate to be the one to break it to you.

[RGBVideo]

stop quoting that guy

[LotC]

Originally posted by VJ
stop quoting that guy

Sorry, I'm drunk. It won't happen again.

[Ben Kenobi]

You're not worth many peoples' time BK. Hate to be the one to break it to you.

I just find it humourous he has me on ignore, and then half the thread is spent discussing me anyways.

No great loss to me.

[LotC]

You have a typically delusional concept of "half" BK.

[Krill]

Good thread

KH, you can insult my intelligence and posting ability later if you want...

[Elok]

Originally posted by Darius871
Oh the rest of that list is just fine, but that doesn't explain why Ben Kenobi was in the middle quintile...

You don't think it takes intelligence to avoid enlightenment that consistently? Arguing with BK is like playing dodgeball with a chicken on crack; no matter how hard you throw the facts or reasoning, he's always standing on the other side of the court by the time they hit where he was standing. He's never at a loss for reasons, however spurious, why your argument is incorrect and he is right. It doesn't demand genius, but I doubt a real and total dipwad could keep it up for long.

[KrazyHorse]

Krill: your good taste is evident. Smarter than I originally gave you credit for. Occasionally tries a little too hard to inject dry British humour.

VJ: I feel like I probably had conflicts with you in the past, though for the life of me I can't remember. You were probably being turgidly right-wing.

Jon: I was worried about you for a while a few years ago. Glad to see that you've landed OK. Can sometimes be fuzzy-headed when thinking about political and social issues (not as compared to Poly norm; have higher standards for you)

Oncle Boris: blah. I tend to skip your posts. Moderate substance, little amusement, too wordy.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by Elok


You don't think it takes intelligence to avoid enlightenment that consistently? Arguing with BK is like playing dodgeball with a chicken on crack; no matter how hard you throw the facts or reasoning, he's always standing on the other side of the court by the time they hit where he was standing. He's never at a loss for reasons, however spurious, why your argument is incorrect and he is right. It doesn't demand genius, but I doubt a real and total dipwad could keep it up for long.

This is not the "bash BK" thread.

Elok: Glorious cluelessness about the fact that I've lived in MD for 5 years. You are too worried about your image (being seen to be wrong) and so occasionally stand back from conversations instead of mixing it up.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Elok


You don't think it takes intelligence to avoid enlightenment that consistently? Arguing with BK is like playing dodgeball with a chicken on crack; no matter how hard you throw the facts or reasoning, he's always standing on the other side of the court by the time they hit where he was standing. He's never at a loss for reasons, however spurious, why your argument is incorrect and he is right. It doesn't demand genius, but I doubt a real and total dipwad could keep it up for long.

That is the perfect analogy. Well done. Today, I hate the Liberal Arts slightly less.

[Elok]

Thanks, I wuv you too Asher. KH, you should bear in mind that when I do "mix it up," I generally am at least partially wrong seven times out of ten. I could remedy that by becoming informed, but that's a lot of work and it's easier to just make snarky comments.

Also, until I asked you, did you know I lived in MD?