Tweet
This election has managed to make you even more pathetic. Awesome.
-
I'm not the one posting already debunked bull****.
-
You're saying I should be that poster if I want to be rid of Palin topics.... hmmmm... tempting
Can I get a PCR thrown in? Down to Settler?Comment
-
Seriously, this site needs better Dem hacks. Posting obviously false stories that were debunked days ago is just weak...Comment
-
I don't follow everything on the internets about Palin (but I should've caught the comment about Bradley running for the Senate). Teh horror. I explicitly said that some of these rumors about Palin aren't credible earlier in the thread. That doesn't mitigate your pathetic comment.Originally posted by Naked Gents Rut
I'm not the one posting already debunked bull****.
"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-BokononComment
-
You couldn't be bothered to read any of the comments on that TNR post you linked to? They started poking holes in the story 5 posts in. Hopefully this lesson will serve to make you a little less credulous in the future.I don't follow everything on the internets about Palin
Comment
-
Aeson
Your post is long-winded and of marginal interest to me. You throw out words like "bias" and when called on using them in a pejorative sense proceed to define them in such a way that they are indistinguishable from "judgment". You've chosen to restrict the idea of "evidence" to that permitted in formal courtroom settings. In other words, it is clear that you are in the mood to substitute sophistry and pedantry for original analytic thought.
When you decide to change your tactics feel free to let me know.
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
EWTPCOriginally posted by Ming
ENOUGH WITH THE PERSONAL CRAP FOLKS...
Discuss the TOPIC and NOT the POSTERS!
"You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran
Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005Comment
-
You couldn't be bothered to read any of the comments on that TNR post you linked to? They started poking holes in the story 5 posts in. Hopefully this lesson will serve to make you a little less credulous in the future.
No, because I didn't care very much about that specific incident. It was an off-hand comment I had just read in the TNR blog. It's not like that passage was all that out of character from everything else that has been written about her.
You really don't have to be such an ass in every post you make."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-BokononComment
-
A large percentage of which is false...It's not like that passage was all that out of character from everything else that has been written about her.
I'm only an ass when it's called for.You really don't have to be such an ass in every post you make.
Comment
-
Drake, do you mind at least applying some critical thought before posting?Originally posted by Naked Gents Rut
MSNBC and The New Republic prove as reasonable and discerning as KH, fall for Palin hoax...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/1..._n_142785.html
I've never even heard of Eisenstadt, let alone attributed any of these stories to him. Nor has the original reporter on this (Cameron IIRC) claimed Eisenstadt as one of his sources.
A false claim by a third party to be the source of a story cannot have any effect on the plausibility of the story.
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
I never claimed you had any opinion on the new Eisenstadt hoax angle. I just wanted to tweak you again since I so rarely get a chance to do it.
Comment
-
No. In civilized society, you don't throw around insults for not having read the bits of trivia that you've read.
A large percentage of which is false...
And a large percentage of the embarrassing **** is probably true. There's the Couric interview for all the world to see."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-BokononComment
-
Boo hoo.No. In civilized society, you don't throw around insults for not having read the bits of trivia that you've read.Comment
-
I never claimed you had any opinion on the new Eisenstadt hoax angle. I just wanted to tweak you again since I so rarely get a chance to do it.
Tweak me on what? As far as I can tell there's been nothing new which impacts the plausibility of this story since the limp-wristed denials by Palin and her debate coach made it appear more plausible than the original claims by themselves did.
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
I think you're being quite unfair to Palin because you don't like her and want to believe anything bad that comes out about her. Just like MSNBC and TNR.Tweak me on what?
One verbal slip-up is not evidence that Palin doesn't know who's in NAFTA, just like Chris Matthews calling Africa a "country" on TV tonight doesn't mean that he actually doesn't know it's a continent. You're applying an inordinately severe standard to Palin's behavior that you (and other reasonable people) don't apply to other public figures.As far as I can tell there's been nothing new which impacts the plausibility of this story since the limp-wristed denials by Palin and her debate coach made it appear more plausible than the original claims by themselves did.Comment
Comment