Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Texas is a cancerous mole on satan's taint

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Texas is a cancerous mole on satan's taint

    Texas man aquitted for shooting unarmed teen in the back, at close range.



    Some of you may recall my earlier threads, such as "Throw Texas out of the union!" Well here is the latest injustice from Satans taint.

    Executive summary: Some young kids broke into this guys trailer for junk food. Both sides in the court agreed the kids were on their knees when he shot them in the back, executing him. He got off.

    LAREDO, Texas (AP) — A Texas jury acquitted a man accused of killing a boy who broke into his home looking for a snack — a case that sparked outrage in this border city, where many thought the man should not have even been charged.

    It took the jury of eight men and four women three hours Friday to find Jose Luis Gonzalez, 63, not guilty of murdering Francisco Anguiano, who was 13 when he and three friends broke into Gonzalez's trailer to rummage for snacks and soda one night in July 2007.

    "I thank God and my attorney, the jury and the judge," Gonzalez said in Spanish after the verdict. "It was a case where it was my life or theirs, and it's a very good thing that they (the jurors) decided in my favor."

    Gonzalez said he was sorry for Anguiano's death, but "it was a situation in which I feared for my life."

    Texas law allows homeowners to use deadly force to protect themselves and their property. In June, a grand jury in Houston cleared a homeowner who shot and killed two burglars outside his neighbor's house despite the dispatcher's repeated request that he stay inside his own home.

    "I feel vindicated for Mr. Gonzalez and his family and for all of the homeowners and all of the seniors in Laredo," said Isidro "Chilo" Alaniz, Gonzalez's attorney. "This case has huge implications across the board. We always, always believed in Mr. Gonzalez's right to defend his life and his property."

    Alaniz is running uncontested for Webb County district attorney in November.

    However, Assistant District Attorney Uriel Druker maintained during his closing arguments that the case was not about homeowners' right to protect their property, but about when a person is justified in using deadly force to do so.

    "What really took place here was a case of vigilantism," he said after the verdict. "A 13-year-old boy was killed because a man was enraged."

    Anguiano's aunt, who asked not to be named, said in Saturday's editions of the Laredo Morning Times that she was disappointed with the verdict.

    "The state fought the case the way it should have," she said. "There was a sufficient amount of evidence, and I thought that some of the jurors would be a father or a mother, and perhaps they would think about this happening to them."

    Gonzalez had endured several break-ins at his trailer when the four boys, ranging in age from 11 to 15, broke in. Gonzalez, who was in a nearby building at the time, went into the trailer and confronted the boys with a 16-gauge shotgun. Then he forced the boys, who were unarmed, to their knees, attorneys on both sides say.

    The boys say they were begging for forgiveness when Gonzalez hit them with the barrel of the shotgun and kicked them repeatedly. Then, the medical examiner testified, Anguiano was shot in the back at close range. Two mashed Twinkies and some cookies were stuffed in the pockets of his shorts.

    Another boy, Jesus Soto Jr., now 16, testified that Gonzalez ordered them at gunpoint to take Anguiano's body outside.

    Gonzalez said he thought Anguiano was lunging at him when he fired the shotgun.

    Many people in Laredo — a town just across the Rio Grande from Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, where drug violence runs rampant — defended Gonzalez's actions. In online responses to articles published by the Morning Times, comments included statements such as "The kid got what he deserved" and calls to "stop the unfair prosecution."

  • #2
    This is mind-blowing

    LAREDO, Texas (AP) — A Texas jury acquitted a man accused of killing a boy who broke into his home looking for a snack — a case that sparked outrage in this border city, where many thought the man should not have even been charged.


    If that's their predisposition, then there's really no reasoning with them. Secession, now! (and I don't think they'll mind that much )


    And
    "I thank God and my attorney, the jury and the judge," Gonzalez said in Spanish after the verdict.
    "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
    "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

    Comment


    • #3
      Texas is so ****ing backwards.
      Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

      Comment


      • #4
        This is Laredo we're talking about. It's practically Mexico.

        Comment


        • #5
          The beauty of the right to jury trial by your peers.
          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

          Comment


          • #6
            I do not want secession Traianvs. I want to throw THEM out of the union. Throw Texas out of the United States and build a huge border wall so these mouth breathind murderers cannot get into our country.

            Comment


            • #7
              The boy should have been sentenced to death posthumously
              Blah

              Comment


              • #8
                Dan doesn't mind because the dead kid wasn't white.
                I'm consitently stupid- Japher
                I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

                Comment


                • #9
                  Killing thieves in one's own home is a man's right. The kid got what he deserved.
                  Graffiti in a public toilet
                  Do not require skill or wit
                  Among the **** we all are poets
                  Among the poets we are ****.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    They were unarmed CHILDREN stealing JUNK FOOD.

                    He did not shoot them as they sculked about, he had them on their knees and he executed them.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Texas is a cancerous mole on satan's taint

                      Originally posted by Vesayen
                      Texas man aquitted for shooting unarmed teen in the back, at close range.



                      Some of you may recall my earlier threads, such as "Throw Texas out of the union!" Well here is the latest injustice from Satans taint.

                      Executive summary: Some young kids broke into this guys trailer for junk food. Both sides in the court agreed the kids were on their knees when he shot them in the back, executing him. He got off.
                      FU
                      Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                      "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                      He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Vesayen
                        They were unarmed CHILDREN stealing JUNK FOOD.

                        He did not shoot them as they sculked about, he had them on their knees and he executed them.
                        They were BURGLARS stealing ITEMS from the man's HOME that has been already BROKEN INTO REPEATEDLY. Of course them man was acting like that.
                        He should've shot both of them. They would've grown into worse criminals anyway.
                        Graffiti in a public toilet
                        Do not require skill or wit
                        Among the **** we all are poets
                        Among the poets we are ****.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I support the death penalty for Texans.

                          Except SlowwHand.
                          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            teh "axis of good" Texas-Russia-Saudi Arabia
                            Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                            GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by onodera

                              They were BURGLARS stealing ITEMS from the man's HOME that has been already BROKEN INTO REPEATEDLY. Of course them man was acting like that.
                              He should've shot both of them. They would've grown into worse criminals anyway.
                              So it should be okay to kill people who are NO DANGER to the homeowner? Brilliant idea for the legal system, lets encourage private citizens to kill others, nothing will go wrong there.

                              He had them on their knees. He could have called the cops and held them there. He could have let them go. He had plenty of options besides murdering children.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X