But that's still an "X is Z because both use Y" (or at least an "X is very much like Z because both use Y") non-sequitur unless I misunderstand the definition of "maverick."
There are many things McCain does and believes which are distinctly Bushlike, but criticizing a vulnerable association in a campaign opponent's past is nothing more than distinctly human.
Meh, we're kicking a dead horse here.
There are many things McCain does and believes which are distinctly Bushlike, but criticizing a vulnerable association in a campaign opponent's past is nothing more than distinctly human.
Meh, we're kicking a dead horse here.
Comment