Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Funny right?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yes, how dare women be angry at men for thousands of years of servitude, oppression, and abuse, rape, and murder. They should learn to treat their masters fairly. And what right to Black people have to be angry about five hundred + years of continuous oppression? They need to get over the fact that everything they had was stolen from them and what meager rights they have only given grudgingly and when stripped of power. They needs to get over being stopped for having nice things or vaguely matching the description of a suspected criminal and having bad schools and being incarcerated at higher rates for the same crimes.
    Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

    Comment


    • #17
      Yes, how dare women be angry at men for thousands of years of servitude, oppression, and abuse, rape, and murder.


      So... that justifies thinking violence towards men by women is no big deal?
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Re: Funny right?

        Originally posted by Kidicious


        I don't think there are any black supremacists. Check your attitude if you want to start changing the world.
        Dude.


        Blac supremacism


        By comparison, black supremacist ideologies have resulted in only relatively isolated cases of violence against others and discrimination; there is no evidence of any powerful, far-reaching nexus of instruments under black influence or control with a corollary effect on whites or other populations.
        Basicaly what it says is that black supremacist would be just as bad as white supremacist if they mearly got the power white supremacism had 50 or 60 years ago. And before you dissmis that think about the possiblity of an African renneisance in 100 or so years in a similar way to China's rise. Or perhaps the results this could have when America will have a black majority.

        No better than white supremacism, the only difference is that white supremacism came first. And people don't seem concerned about it at all.
        Last edited by Heraclitus; May 27, 2008, 11:47.
        Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
        The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
        The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by chegitz guevara
          Yes, how dare women be angry at men for thousands of years of servitude, oppression, and abuse, rape, and murder. They should learn to treat their masters fairly. And what right to Black people have to be angry about five hundred + years of continuous oppression? They need to get over the fact that everything they had was stolen from them and what meager rights they have only given grudgingly and when stripped of power. They needs to get over being stopped for having nice things or vaguely matching the description of a suspected criminal and having bad schools and being incarcerated at higher rates for the same crimes.
          Dude first off there have been several examples of matirarchal societies in history so the first part of your post is not as black and white as you would like to present. And yes women are incapable of murder, abuse, opression and rape. (rape is debatable if a woman plants durgs and viagra into a guys drink and then procceds to have her way with him, I would argue that is rape)

          Listen dude anger will solve nothing, a commie should know that. The abused becoming the abuser is also nonsense. Your position is naive and not well thought through.


          Disenfranchised people should work towards equality, if they seek superiority then they are not better than the the group currently in power. Since at one point in history the groups in power where the underdogs and suffered injustice. (I'm regering primarily to groups like nations and ethnincities)

          A commie should be working towards a classles and fair society, not promoting the replacement of one elite with another. But hey every communist goverment that has ever come into existance has done that, so perhaps you think that that is real communism.
          Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
          The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
          The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

          Comment


          • #20
            Rape is defined as sexual contact against a person's will or without consent.

            A man can get an erection and still not give consent for sex. You can't take a physiological reaction and infer consent from that.

            There are cases of women who have raped males, most notably caretakers who have had sex with males in their care, usually those who with a disability or who are minors.
            "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

            Comment


            • #21
              Yes, let's ignore 99% of reality and concentrate on the 1% where injustice is perpetrated on the oppressing class.
              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Re: Re: Funny right?

                Originally posted by Heraclitus


                Dude.


                Blac supremacism




                Basicaly what it says is that black supremacist would be just as bad as white supremacist if they mearly got the power white supremacism had 50 or 60 years ago.
                No it doesn't. White supremacism is defined as white domination over other races. Black supremacism is defined as black liberation. Another bad term. You would have people believe that blacks are trying to take over the country or something like that. I think that's racist and harmfull.
                And before you dissmis that think about the possiblity of an African renneisance in 100 or so years in a similar way to China's rise. Or perhaps the results this could have when America will have a black majority.

                No better than white supremacism, the only difference is that white supremacism came first. And people don't seem concerned about it at all.
                Bull****. Plenty of people are concerned about it. Too bad they aren't concerned about the real evils of society.
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                  Yes, how dare women be angry at men for thousands of years of servitude, oppression, and abuse, rape, and murder.
                  And you defend all (OK, only some) sorts of unsavoury religious dogmas because we shouldn't judge the whole by the actions of a "few bad apples"?

                  Is this the same Che? Or do we have a case of cognitive dissonance of epic proportions?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                    Yes, how dare women be angry at men for thousands of years of servitude, oppression, and abuse, rape, and murder.


                    So... that justifies thinking violence towards men by women is no big deal?
                    Please... Do you know how many threads are created on the website complaining about the oppression of the white male? Women do not frequently use violence against men. It literally is no big deal in comparison. So why all the complaining about it? But who complains about violence against women?
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                      Yes, let's ignore 99% of reality and concentrate on the 1% where injustice is perpetrated on the oppressing class.
                      I have an ever better idea. Why not simply try to serve justice without regards to some preconceived notions of classes?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                        Yes, how dare women be angry at men for thousands of years of servitude, oppression, and abuse, rape, and murder.
                        Well said, che!

                        They should ****ing get over it.

                        I work with a feminist ***** and it's ****ing annoying. She's the most sexist person I know.

                        "Whenever a crime is committed against a woman, it's BECAUSE she's a woman."

                        Reverse sexism is sexism.
                        "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                        Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Why don't you get over it Asher?
                          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            What am I to get over?
                            "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                            Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              How about we open our eyes and look at the world without bias?

                              99%, 1%, those are (made-up) statistics. When you start thinking in terms of statistics, instead of the dignity of individual humans, you lose moral perspective.
                              John Brown did nothing wrong.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by aneeshm
                                And you defend all (OK, only some) sorts of unsavoury religious dogmas because we shouldn't judge the whole by the actions of a "few bad apples"?

                                Is this the same Che? Or do we have a case of cognitive dissonance of epic proportions?
                                I don't defend any religious dogmas. I'm an atheist.
                                Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X