Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I want you to have my organs, but you can't have 'em

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • As it stands now, the whole condition is "are you gay? if so, you can't donate" which is the make or break condition.
    Wait, so lesbians CAN'T donate?
    "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

    Comment


    • I'm using gay to refer to gay men. Lesbians refer to the women.

      The general term is Gay & Lesbian.
      "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
      Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kidicious
        Should I be able to donate if I sleep with whores?
        You can, yes. It's not a question that they ask.

        Not sure what your point is.
        "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
        Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

        Comment


        • Originally posted by DinoDoc
          Scenario: You're a week from certain death if you don't get a new heart. You've been on the list 3 years. Finally, a heart becomes available. It's from a fit 24 year old male, who according to family and friends was an IV drug user. The heart however was tested and deemed to be free of diseases.

          Do you turn the heart down, or do you take it?

          If anyone, anywhere answers "take it", then a policy of banning IV drug users from donating is misguided. Period.
          Case 1: If I reject the heart, I'll die. No thank you.

          Case 2: If I take the heart, I'll live but might contract AIDS. Nasty but far better than being dead. Give me the heart.
          Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
          I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure

          Comment


          • I'm using gay to refer to gay men. Lesbians refer to the women.
            Yes but same sex orientation is not the break out because if it were lesbians would be included.
            "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Patroklos


              Yes but same sex orientation is not the break out because if it were lesbians would be included.
              The sexual orientation is male attraction to male.

              I'm sorry but your semantics just aren't cutting the mustard. The bottom line is it's not behaviour that is the make or break, if it was monogamous long-term relationships between men would be fine. It's entirely about if they are gay and that alone. Period.

              (YES WEZIL. I UNDERSTAND. THIS ARGUMENT IS STILL VALID AS PART OF THE THREAD DISCUSSION.)
              "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
              Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

              Comment


              • cutting the mustard? wtf?!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by b etor
                  cutting the mustard? wtf?!
                  "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                  Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                  Comment


                  • yes, i just looked it up, i've just never heard or seen it used before.

                    Comment


                    • Not really Asher, you just can't accept the Math.

                      The premise is fine, you just want them to break it down even futher. I don't know what the cost/benefit is for that, maybe it is doable maybe it isn't. If it is it should be done. Break it down as far as the math will support I'd say.

                      It is clear though, that whichever way the math goes, this is not a slight agaist teh gayz. You are just being paranoid. An entire government department did not wake up today and go to work and realize over morning coffee that they all had the same dream about ****ing Asher and his gay brotherhood over through a circuiteous backdoor plan teh gayz will never expect (actually that might be exactly what they would expect);

                      ORGAN DONATION!

                      BWAHAH, BWAHAHAH, BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
                      "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Asher

                        (YES WEZIL. I UNDERSTAND. THIS ARGUMENT IS STILL VALID AS PART OF THE THREAD DISCUSSION.)
                        As long as you are discussing theory and not fact. Your comments were written as staemnts of fact.

                        I've looked for the relevant reg but have not found it yet. Blood donation is under Food & Drug ( ) but I can't pin down the organ donation regs.
                        "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
                        "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Patroklos
                          Not really Asher, you just can't accept the Math.
                          Sorry, when people are dying I care not about the math. The simple facts are there are always far more people waiting for donations than people donating. Getting rid of perfectly good organs due to biases or statistical generalizations effectively kills those people.

                          It is clear though, that whichever way the math goes, this is not a slight agaist teh gayz. You are just being paranoid.
                          No, you're not understanding the arguments. I don't think this is rampant homophobia in the government, I think it's ineptitude. It is a problem of overly general application of statistics to the detriment of dying people.

                          An entire government department did not wake up today and go to work and realize over morning coffee that they all had the same dream about ****ing Asher and his gay brotherhood over through a circuiteous backdoor plan teh gayz will never expect (actually that might be exactly what they would expect);

                          ORGAN DONATION!

                          BWAHAH, BWAHAHAH, BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
                          I've NEVER even implied such nonsense. I don't think this has anything to do with Health Canada hating gays or anything, I just think they're horribly inept bureaucrats.
                          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
                          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Arrian
                            Of course, my idea only works if they accept gay organ donations and keep them separate.

                            But I don't see why, if a patient is clearly going to die for want of an organ, and is too far down on the list to get a doubleplusgood straight organ transplant, they shouldn't be offered the opportunity to get an ungood gay organ and hope for the best...

                            Then again, I dunno how that scenario would really play out. Aren't people who are on death's door moved up the waiting list anyway?

                            -Arrian
                            They'll sue if they get aids from said desperation risk. or to put that more succinctly: Money.

                            Comment


                            • I'll take a gay organ, if it means death if I don't. Who is it for them to decide (whoever them is)? I hear of people getting aids from "straight" dudes organs and blood, so I really don't think the issue is where it comes from but the inadequacey of the institutions to be able to test for aids.

                              Unless, that is, gay organs make you gay!
                              Monkey!!!

                              Comment


                              • You'd be gay at heart.
                                "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X