Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is your most detested philosopher ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jon Miller
    Philosophy is aimed at the natural world (+ some), religion is not aimed at the natural world. Science only deals with the natural world.

    JM
    I meant that philosophy and religion deal with a lot of the same cosmological, ethical and social issues. And I'm pretty sure Christian morals tell human beings how to live in this world.
    Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

    Comment


    • #32
      That isn't aimed at explaining the natural world, and science doesn't really seek to address those types of issues.

      Christianity has been (mis)used to explain the natural world in the past. This isn't it's purpose though, and is a misapplication. Many other religions are meant to explain the natural world (Zeus causes lightning/etc).

      JM
      Jon Miller-
      I AM.CANADIAN
      GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

      Comment


      • #33
        Philosophy (General) is outdone by science in reference to the natural world, and to religion or religion like specializations (humanism) outside of explaining the natural world.

        JM
        Jon Miller-
        I AM.CANADIAN
        GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

        Comment


        • #34
          Ok, buy the argument.

          Actually, think that philosophy is relevant wether it's based upon nazism, bolchevism, teism, ateism or any other kind of ism. If not, we would probably still live by 10.000 year old standards.
          With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

          Steven Weinberg

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jon Miller
            That isn't aimed at explaining the natural world, and science doesn't really seek to address those types of issues.
            No it doesn't. That was my point.
            Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

            Comment


            • #36
              I guess that I divorce specializations (like science) from the originator (philosophy). I don't think that philosophy has added anything? since the late 19th century.

              That isn't to say that it won't add something again. But just to say that currently it is pretty unimportant.

              JM
              Jon Miller-
              I AM.CANADIAN
              GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

              Comment


              • #37
                Original Posted by Elok
                Also, it may surprise you to learn that this is the twenty-first century, not the eighteenth, and the so-called enlightenment has been over for quite a while now. Exactly how long is not really settled. Anyway, get with the times. If you're going to be an atheist, fine, but get your head out of your arse.
                Oh sorry I missed the Counter-Enlightenment and the return of the Dark Ages, though with the way things are going now ya never know. Please do explain how my dislike of Plato, or perhapse its being an atheist, means my head is up my arse.

                Original Posted by Jhon Miller
                Was in response to Impaler, who posted a normal 'thoughtless atheist' post (not to say that all atheists are thoguhtless, but it does seem the most vocal are of that variety).
                I think you confuse 'thoughtless' with 'offensive to me'.

                I must be doing well to have struck such a nerve, now we can have a nice rip-roaring debate
                Companions the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators, the creator seeks - those who write new values on new tablets. Companions the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest. - Thus spoke Zarathustra, Fredrick Nietzsche

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Nostromo
                  If Ayn Rand was a philosopher, Elton John is a ladies man
                  Objectivism is a school of filosofy, is it not?
                  I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                  For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Jon Miller
                    Christianity has been (mis)used to explain the natural world in the past. This isn't it's purpose though, and is a misapplication. Many other religions are meant to explain the natural world (Zeus causes lightning/etc).

                    JM
                    That really doesn't make any sense - christianity just like any other religion tries to make some kind of sense of the world.
                    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                    Steven Weinberg

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Jon Miller
                      I guess that I divorce specializations (like science) from the originator (philosophy). I don't think that philosophy has added anything? since the late 19th century.

                      That isn't to say that it won't add something again. But just to say that currently it is pretty unimportant.

                      JM
                      Why do you assume that explaining the natural world is the only worthwhile thing to do? Its important, that's for damn sure, but its not the only important thing in life, nor the most important.

                      That said, contemporary philosophers made somewhat important contributions in logic (Russell, Carnap...), on the study of language (speech acts theory, among other things) and on the study of the human mind (consciousness, etc, etc).

                      And I'm not talking about their contributions to stuff that you don't seem to consider important, like social, ethical and political issues
                      Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Impaler[WrG]


                        Oh sorry I missed the Counter-Enlightenment and the return of the Dark Ages, though with the way things are going now ya never know. Please do explain how my dislike of Plato, or perhapse its being an atheist, means my head is up my arse.



                        I think you confuse 'thoughtless' with 'offensive to me'.

                        I must be doing well to have struck such a nerve, now we can have a nice rip-roaring debate
                        Would you rather I had used ill-informed but speaks anyways? I already told you that you didn't know what you were talking about with respect to Plato. Why should I debate you?

                        This is why you have your head up your arse. Not all atheists do.

                        JM
                        Jon Miller-
                        I AM.CANADIAN
                        GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by BlackCat


                          That really doesn't make any sense - christianity just like any other religion tries to make some kind of sense of the world.
                          I know you don't understand what Christianity is.

                          JM
                          Jon Miller-
                          I AM.CANADIAN
                          GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by DinoDoc
                            Objectivism is a school of filosofy, is it not?
                            I've never heard of any significant filosofizer carrying this tag. Mostly, "objectivism" appears to be Rand's ill-fated claim of believing there's something more objective about her crappy philosophy.
                            In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Jon Miller


                              I know you don't understand what Christianity is.

                              JM
                              Who does ?
                              In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Well, I do admit that it is different things to different people. But core to Christianity is the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

                                That some Christians think that the Christianity tells them where they come from, or why they are here on this earth, is just incidental and not core to Christianity.

                                Core to Christianity is:
                                Increasing Knowledge of God
                                Transformation of Self*

                                Both through the life and sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

                                JM
                                *If I had to pick just one, this is it.
                                Last edited by Jon Miller; November 25, 2007, 21:58.
                                Jon Miller-
                                I AM.CANADIAN
                                GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X