People evolved from monkeys and for millions of years we were hunter-gatherers who always moved in search of game and edible berries.
Human psyche evolved to suit that lifestyle. Living in relatively small groups of hunters and migrating.
Sedentary lifestyle which we practice today is only a couple of thousand years old.
Therefore I ask: does patriotism make sense?
Obviously it exists as an emotion, people do get attached to land. But how strong should this emotion objectively be?
If hunter-gatherers of old had been too connected to some particular area, they would have starved when they spent its resources.
I conclude that biologically, patriotism should be a rather weak emotion. Most of it is probably learned, not least from the state propaganda machine (I always wanted to use that phrase
). On a scale of things to which people should feel attached to, homeland should be pretty low.
I'd add that loving your people is another matter. Compared to patriotism it actually does make sense biologically.
What do you think?
Human psyche evolved to suit that lifestyle. Living in relatively small groups of hunters and migrating.
Sedentary lifestyle which we practice today is only a couple of thousand years old.
Therefore I ask: does patriotism make sense?
Obviously it exists as an emotion, people do get attached to land. But how strong should this emotion objectively be?
If hunter-gatherers of old had been too connected to some particular area, they would have starved when they spent its resources.
I conclude that biologically, patriotism should be a rather weak emotion. Most of it is probably learned, not least from the state propaganda machine (I always wanted to use that phrase

I'd add that loving your people is another matter. Compared to patriotism it actually does make sense biologically.
What do you think?
Comment