Tweet
Originally posted by Colon™
If it's a stealth vessel, how come I can still see it?
If it's a stealth vessel, how come I can still see it?
-
No, It's the other one in the picture.
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003 -
Coolest Ship never built...Attached Files"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
-
And the war nerd can explain why carriers have a more limited utility than you guys think.Originally posted by Lonestar
Because it has angles so it's stealth lol
I'm sure Pat can explain the practical reason why Stealth Ships have a more limited utility than Ollie thinks.
So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!Comment
-
If everybody in the world has stealth stuff for everything, noone will be able to identify and fight his enemy anymore.
Then, world peace is achieved.
BlahComment
-
BeBro - that is the best argument for stealth technology I have ever seen. I applaud you, my man
AsmodeanIm not sure what Baruk Khazad is , but if they speak Judeo-Dwarvish, that would be "blessed are the dwarves" - lord of the markComment
-
Except that it would give an unfair advantage to the ones who decided to just fake it.Comment
-
And that's when Lithuania takes over.Originally posted by Serb:Please, remind me, how exactly and when exactly, Russia bullied its neighbors?
Originally posted by Ted Striker:Go Serb !
Originally posted by Pekka:If it was possible to capture the essentials of Sepultura in a dildo, I'd attach it to a bicycle and ride it up your azzes.Comment
-
Well if the war nerd says so then it must be true. Even if war nerd is more than willing to have the country "go to war every now and then" when he hasn't served. Of course, these current wars he is opposed to, and go figure CVNs have figured promiently in the actions...Originally posted by Chemical Ollie
And the war nerd can explain why carriers have a more limited utility than you guys think.
Of course, OEF wouldn't have done much of anything for several months(until we had facilities that met USAF standards set up in central asia) if it weren't for said Carriers. Or OIF...Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
-
Wow! The Belgian navy has really, really, really improved!Originally posted by Colon™
Obligatory picture:
I must say though, that suspiciously looks a lot like one of ours. You guys have really mastered the art of shoplifting."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!Comment
-
What the H does it do?Originally posted by PLATO
Coolest Ship never built..."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!Comment
-
It was intended to replace the BB's in the Naval Gunfire support role for the Marines.Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
What the H does it do?
Lots of problems with that, obviously. Such as no guns(they were just gonna use a ****load of Standard Missiles).Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
-
Originally posted by Lonestar
It was intended to replace the BB's in the Naval Gunfire support role for the Marines.
Lots of problems with that, obviously. Such as no guns(they were just gonna use a ****load of Standard Missiles).
Ahhh, I see we're taking a page from the British invasion of the Falklands.
Comment
-
It's a Japanese Aircraft Carrier.
Oh shi-Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.Comment
-
Putin said that "others" didn't cancel their long range bomber patrols when USSR did it. Since only USA and Russia has a long range bomber fleet, it's obvious that he talked about USA. And i bet he's better informed than you.Originally posted by Patroklos
Meanwhile, the US still hasn't flown a long range bomber patrol since the breakup of the USSR.
You don't need something like stealth subs so to sink a big sitting ducks like carriers.Originally posted by Chemical Ollie
Bah, our stealth subs will sink them all, anyway
It all comes out of the "Millenium Challenge '02" war games we staged in the Persian Gulf this summer. The big scandal was that the Opposing Force Commander, Gen. Paul van Ripen, quit mid-game because the games were rigged for the US forces to win. The scenario was a US invasion of an unnamed Persian Gulf country (either Iraq or Iran). The US was testing a new hi-tech joint force doctrine, so naturally van Riper used every lo-tech trick he could think of to mess things up. When the Americans jammed his CCC network , he sent messages by motorbike.
But that was just playing around. They wouldn't have minded that. Might've even congratulated van Ripen, bought him a drink for his smarts, at the post-games party.
The truth is that van Ripen did something so important that I still can't believe the mainstream press hasn't made anything of it. With nothing more than a few "small boats and aircraft," van Ripen managed to sink most of the US fleet in the Persian Gulf.
What this means is as simple and plain as a skull: every US Navy battle group, every one of those big fancy aircraft carriers we love, won't last one single day in combat against a serious enemy.Knowledge is PowerComment
-
You realize you're linking the opinion piece from a guy who advocates using WMDs on the civilian population in Iraq as a "solution" to win the war.Originally posted by Ellestar
Putin said that "others" didn't cancel their long range bomber patrols when USSR did it. Since only USA and Russia has a long range bomber fleet, it's obvious that he talked about USA. And i bet he's better informed than you.
You don't need something like stealth subs so to sink a big sitting ducks like carriers.
Forgive me if I don't take his doom and gloom "CARRIERS ARE OBSOLETE" babble seriously based off a lopsided war game designed to have happen exactly what did happen.
But hey, if your country wants to base their war doctrine off an obese nerd's internet blog, more power to you.
Comment
Comment