Stupid Canadian Cops Busted Trying To Incite Protest Riot

[CrONoS]

tap tap tap tap tap

Ceiling cat is watching Agathon masturbate, over Montebello youtube video!

[CrONoS]

The news is everywhere in newspaper today in Quebec.

I should also say that the mainstream media didn't spoke a lot about it, since the video appeared on youtube, versus the buzz that was going around on several Quebec blog's.

I should say that if these guy's did throw rocks, bottle or anything, a lot of police officer should be hardly punish.

[Wezil]

"Economic" protestors are not a PC-protected protest group (as natives are for example). The cops and powers that be would have loved to have smashed some skulls to show the riff-raff who is in charge. They just needed a reason....

[CrONoS]

Infiltrations à Montebello: la SQ s'expliquera

Presse Canadienne

Montréal

La Sûreté du Québec tiendra une conférence de presse vendredi après-midi, vers 15h30, pour expliquer l'infiltration de trois de ses membres identifiés comme agents provocateurs parmi les manifestants de Montebello, en début de semaine.

It say:

Quebec police will have a press conference today at 15h30 about the incident.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Flubber



Ya-- that darn Flubber-- always wanting evidence of stuff before assuming it and assessing the video for what it actually shows and not taking the word of some unknown individual as to what happened off the video


How annoying !!!

We all want evidence man. A lot of the time it's not there. That's why the rest of use use common sense. These men were behaving immorally in my opinion, and I think most peoples. Yet you want to give them the benefit of the doubt.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by CrONoS
tap tap tap tap tap

Ceiling cat is watching Agathon masturbate, over Montebello youtube video!

good one

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Wezil
"Economic" protestors are not a PC-protected protest group (as natives are for example). The cops and powers that be would have loved to have smashed some skulls to show the riff-raff who is in charge. They just needed a reason....

So you think its the authorities simply wanting to show those people that have the "audacity to protest" their power?

Could be. My thinking is different in that I think a true show of power is dismiss people as irrelevant. I would have thought that violence would have raised the profile of the protest and would have been the opposite of what the authorities would want.

BUt perhaps some think that violence tends to get blamed on protesters and therefore tends to discredit them with the general public a bit.

I don't know. I still don't see any reason why higher authorities would want any form of violence. I would have thought that they would get the most plaudits for arranging things such that all demonstrations were peaceful.

[Patroklos]

These men were behaving immorally in my opinion, and I think most peoples.

From what you actually saw on the video, not what you are assuming, what was immoral?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Patroklos


From what you actually saw on the video, not what you are assuming, what was immoral?

We know for sure that at the least they were spying on citizens.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


We all want evidence man. A lot of the time it's not there. That's why the rest of use use common sense. These men were behaving immorally in my opinion, and I think most peoples. Yet you want to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Immorally? I have no idea what that means.

I just know in the video, they did nothing. If you think otherwise please cite the time of their misconduct.

It may well be that their plan was foiled when people declared them as police and they were aware of the videos being taken. BUt until there is more evidence, I will give them the benefit of the doubt.

I would do the same for you if you were charged with something

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Flubber
I would do the same for you if you were charged with something

I don't believe that for a second. I'm sure you would say MAYBE he was going to throw that rock.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


We know for sure that at the least they were spying on citizens.

So police do not have the right to walk about undercover in a large gathering in a public place??

Why not? If any other person is free to walk there why cannot someone that happens to be a policeman?

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Kidicious


I don't believe that for a second. .

Too bad-- it happens to be true. My profession and training means that I assess things with a very critical mind and I happen to believe strongly in innocent until proven guilty.

I would require the same level of proof whether it was you, a police officer or the president of the United States.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Flubber



So police do not have the right to walk about undercover in a large gathering in a public place??

Why not? If any other person is free to walk there why cannot someone that happens to be a policeman?

O MY ****ing GOD! This is the crap I'm talking about. You think they were on patrol? Flubber you are ****ing stupid!

[Lul Thyme]

This story was in "La Presse" (biggest newspaper in Quebec) this morning.
SQ (Surete du Quebec), the provincial police, has confirmed that the 3 guys were agents.

http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20070824/CPOPINIONS05/708240461/6730/CPACTUALITES

See here for a bit more about whether any of this was illegal:

http://blogues.cyberpresse.ca/lagace/?p=70720300