Stupid Canadian Cops Busted Trying To Incite Protest Riot

[Shrapnel12]

I'm at least 80%, maybe more, convinced they were cops. I just wish that didn't put me on Agathon's side because his anti-capitalism BS really turns my stomach.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Shrapnel12
I'm at least 80%, maybe more, convinced they were cops. I just wish that didn't put me on Agathon's side because his anti-capitalism BS really turns my stomach.

Why not try defending capitalism, then? I'm sure I could whup you like I was your Daddy.

BTW, I don't presently advocate much more than the Swedish have, if that makes you feel better.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Donegeal
I don't have alot of time but here is my conspiracy on this:

They didn't take their masks off because they are the kind of people who like to go to protests and cause trouble. If they took their masks off, they would be identifiable to not only authorities who would them in turn not let them participate, but also to protest organisers, who would make sure they were banned from the protest.

They all crossed the line at the same time, not because they were organised, but because one saw an oppertunity, and the others followed behind.

I don't nessicarily believe the stuff I just said because there is no solid evidence to support it, just like there is nothing but unsubstaniated conjecture on the part of the people in the video and some posters on this forum.

Anyway.. I got to go pick up my wife from the hospital. She had Gall Bladder surgery yesturday that didn't go the best in the world. Later.

Am I the only one looking at Donegeal's avatar and thinking how appropriate it is now?

Man, you are a cop. You are suppose to have some common sense and be able to judge situations correctly. I'm a little disturbed.

[MRT144]

no cop crosses the thin blue line. cops stick up for one another, right or wrong, because they are cops.

[Kidlicious]

You're just saying that cause you're a black man.

[Shrapnel12]

Originally posted by Agathon


Why not try defending capitalism, then? I'm sure I could whup you like I was your Daddy.

BTW, I don't presently advocate much more than the Swedish have, if that makes you feel better.

Well ok, as long as you don't start wearing red, unless it's Chinese red (Capitalist communists ).

[MRT144]

Originally posted by Kidicious
You're just saying that cause you're a black man.

maurice claurett is a reminder to all; dont squander opportunities by being arrogant.

[Flubber]

Hmm -- they were probably cops-- there is enough there to make that deduction, although it is not at all certain . They could simply be three very odd individuals that bought the same boots.


If they were police, the question is what they were doing. If they were merely trying to mingle and find out the crowd's intentions, that would be fair ball in my mind.

IF they were trying to incite something, that is clearly wrong and stupid and dnagerous for everyone. But I never saw them incite anything in the video-- the main evidence seemed to be that one guy had a rock-- and some claims by some of the people present.

Oh and it seemed they were far from the only masked protesters there although the people that were front and centre (union members?) seemed very middle-claass middle-aged by their appearance .

Oh and somewhere someone commented on "Harper and his minions"-- I forget who-- does anyone think that the PM would get directly involved in such a matter?

[Wezil]

My explanation is much simpler (based upon the forces involved).

SQ - A Bust Heads 1st ask questions later force.

RCMP - Terminally incompetant.

Put the two together and you would get a plan like that imagined in this thread. They didn't need Harper to **** this one up.

[Kataphraktoi]

I say 99.9% they were cops. It matches up with so many incidents, in the USA , they are almost without number.

Its not like im a leftie here, saying that

[Shrapnel12]

Well assuming they are cops, they are definitely incompetant no matter what their motives were. Observing how poor their disguises were, what if their idea of blending in was equally ridiculous. Having a bigoted preconception of protestors, perhaps they just assumed this would turn violent and as a way of blending in, they acted how they thought the protestors were acting or would act. In other words:

[Agathon]

In other news.

Stupid Canadian Cops admit they infiltrated the protest.

I telt ye!!!

http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/249291

Quebec police admit agents posed as protestors
August 23, 2007
STEVE LAMBERT
CANADIAN PRESS
MONTREAL — With the proof caught on video, Quebec provincial police were forced to admit Thursday that three undercover agents were playing the part of protestors at this week’s international summit in Montebello, Que.

But the Quebec police force denied they were attempting to provoke protestors into violence. Rather, they said the three were planted in the crowd to locate any protestors who were not peacefully demonstrating.

Police said the trio’s cover was blown when they refused to toss any objects.

“At no time did the Quebec provincial police officers act as agents provocateurs or commit criminal acts. Also, it is not part of the policy of the police force nor is it part of its strategy to act in this manner. At all times, the officers responded to their mandate to maintain law and order,” the QPP said in a news release on Thursday night.

The police said after viewing a video clip from YouTube.com and video shot by police officers, they were able to confirm the three were Quebec provincial police officers.

Earlier, both the QPP and the RCMP had denied altogether any of their officers were involved.

The Quebec provincial police declined to comment further, a spokeswoman in Montreal said. And while Quebec Justice Minister Jacques Dupuis was made aware of the news, a spokesman from his office said he will not comment on the matter either.

Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day rejected opposition calls Thursday for an inquiry into agents role in trying to provoke protesters into violence at this week’s North American leaders summit in Montebello, Que.

“I’ve made the inquiries and there was no RCMP that were involved as far as those three individuals go,” Day told reporters after making a crime-prevention announcement in Winnipeg.

“If people have concerns ... there is a complaints process for the RCMP. There is also one for the Surete du Quebec. This incident happened in Quebec, so I imagine people could also file under that complaints process.”

Day’s words did little to appease Dave Coles, the union leader who confronted the three men on the protest line and accused them of being cops.

“We’re going to talk to our legal counsel and we’ll decide (Friday) what our next action is going to be,” said Coles, president of the Communications Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada.

The Liberals called for a police probe into the issue, while the NDP called on Day to launch a public inquiry. The NDP said the public should be worried about the possibility police officers were used to try to turn a peaceful protest into a violent one.

“If they are police officers, and if they are stepping forward with a mandate to disrupt in any way, that’s a cause for concern,” said New Democrat MP Peter Julian.

The three officers, sporting bandannas, showed up on the front lines of a peaceful protest at the Security and Prosperity Partnership summit earlier this week.

One carried a large rock, and protesters allege the officers were trying to incite a riot so that police could move on the crowd.

The event was captured on video and shows one of the mystery men talking to police officers before being brought to the ground, handcuffed and quietly led away along with his friends.

The men were never charged, and photos show them wearing combat boots with identical markings to the ones worn by police at the scene.

“It’s just too coincidental that these guys attack a (police) line with a boulder and they’re not charged,” Coles said.

“The other four protesters who were arrested (over the weekend) were all charged.”

Quebec Provincial Police and the RCMP have both said they do not use agents to provoke violence.

RCMP spokesman Cpl. Luc Bessette said this week he could not discuss details of security measures for major events such as the summit because it could compromise future operations.

Now how are they going to explain away the police officer refusing to put down that rock and refusing to heed the calls of that man to peacefully protest? And how are they going to explain away the fact that all the other anarchists refused their request to start violence against the police line?

Just sayin...

[Agathon]

And on another note...

Originally posted by Donegeal

Yes I did, and I just watched it again.

This entire thing is based on nothing but unsupported accusations and circumstantial evidence. There is absolutely nothing that proves they were cops. This is why your train of though on this can be compared to the Moon Landing Hoax or even flat earth. Its ridiculous and I am genuinely stunned that some on this board agree with you. Then again, this board did spout Ned and his conspiracies.

OWNED BIATCH!!!!!!!!

I'M IN UR POSTZ, REFUTIN UR CLAIMZ!!!

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Agathon


Nothing.

On the other hand, when they mingle with the crowd with the sole purpose of starting a fight, which will result in law abiding people being attacked by the police, I think most people, other than the Canadian Adolf Hitler Appreciation Society, will have a problem with that.

I didn't see them doing anything outrageous or inciteful in the clip posted.

Oh, and congrats on the Godwin.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by notyoueither


I didn't see them doing anything outrageous or inciteful in the clip posted.

Oh, and congrats on the Godwin.

Why should we believe the police? They've lied already.

The video clearly shows the police officers holding rocks and the rest of the protesters yelling at them to put the rocks down. None of the protesters are holding rocks, and they are shown claiming that the police wanted them to be more aggressive.

The police now claim that they were trying to stop other protesters from hurling rocks, but the evidence shows the opposite.

Congratulations on being an authoritarian bootlicker though. This is just another in an endless series of posts by you condoning state backed violence against law abiding citizens.