Baby Boomers must die...

[Ben Kenobi]

Death Panels! Death Panels!

[Theben]

No, he doesn't. The Baby Boom was 1946-1964.

Depends who you ask, then. I've seen 1941-1960 cited. Given that's when men 1st started going to war ('41), it's plausible.

Given that the Baby Boomers have yet to hit age 65, it logically follows that I don't want to euthanize anyone over the age of 65.

Again, it only logically follows if you use your criteria. But if you say you don't wanna kill anyone, fine.

And don't get too excited Ben... there won't be any death panels. Sorry to disappoint*.




*-I'm not sorry.

[Drake Tungsten]

Depends who you ask, then.

No, it doesn't. "The United States Census Bureau defines the demographic birth boom as between 1946 and 1964."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-World_War_II_baby_boom

I've seen 1941-1960 cited. Given that's when men 1st started going to war ('41), it's plausible.

That doesn't even make any sense. The baby boom was a result of soldiers returning from the war and humping their women like there was no tomorrow. Starting the boom during the war is completely retarded, as is anyone who thinks such a definition of the baby boom is "plausible."

But if you say you don't wanna kill anyone, fine.

I didn't say I don't want to kill anyone. I think I've been pretty clear that it's the Baby Boomers who need to die, however.

[Theben]

You gonna go off to war and not give the wife a farewell ****? Really?

[OzzyKP]

Yea, I've never seen 1941-1960.

[Drake Tungsten]

You gonna go off to war and not give the wife a farewell ****? Really?

Yes, because lots of 18-year old conscripts were already married...

[Riesstiu IV]

You also have to remember that prior to 41, b*tches weren't putting out because none of the men had jobs.

[Theben]

Strange how then both of my parents, long considered 'boomer's, were born in '43 and '45.

[Drake Tungsten]

It's not strange at all. Given the intelligence you've displayed in this thread, it doesn't surprise me at all that your parents couldn't figure out that being born during the war meant they weren't part of the post-war baby boom.

[Theben]

Maybe if you weren't trying so hard to be a jackass, you could understand that cultural events don't subscribe to government definitions.

Also that "to be considered" is normally done from without, i.e., others defined them as boomers. Time to crack open dem books, junior.

[Drake Tungsten]

Maybe if you weren't such a dumbass, you'd understand that one can't be a "Baby Boomer" if you weren't actually born during the baby boom.

[Theben]

I expect some intelligence from you in your posts, Drake. It's sad to see you didn't bother for this one, which is bad enough... but this topic doesn't require much. Sad.

[Drake Tungsten]

Dude, you thought the baby boom began in 1941. You are in no position to question my intelligence.

[Theben]

Dude, I said there is more than one definition. Even wiki states a difference between the sociologists view and a cultural view. Deal with it.

[Drake Tungsten]

No view that isn't completely retarded starts the baby boom during WWII.