The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Leftist youth groups conduct street battles with police in Copenhagen
Originally posted by Kidicious
Sure they don't care about the property.
Given the condition the let it deteriorate to I'd have to say that was the case.
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Originally posted by Arrian
Hmm, by that logic the biggest mistake the city made in all of this came back in 1982.
-Arrian
Yes, that makes it hard to believe that the property wasn't given to them. If you let an anarcist occupy your building you should not expect to have an easy time getting it back.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Well, based on what I've read about the history of the place, the various people & groups that have occupied it have been leftist, but not necessarily all anarchists. They may have veered in that direction in the 90s, for all we know.
It sounds like relations between the council and the Ungdomshuset deteriorated in the mid-to-late 1990s. The fire, the mold/rot, the apparent trouble in getting in to renovate...
Originally posted by Kidicious
Yes, that makes it hard to believe that the property wasn't given to them. If you let an anarcist occupy your building you should not expect to have an easy time getting it back.
try to occupy MY building, sun, and youve got a WAR
i dont blame the fundys here at all. you are just strengthing my case with your undying love and support for these idiot anarchists.
Yes, that makes it hard to believe that the property wasn't given to them. If you let an anarcist occupy your building you should not expect to have an easy time getting it back.
Exactly. Especially when the council didnt appoint them a new equal location. This is really a sad story about the competence of the Copenhagen City council.
Why is the city required to give this group stuff for free?
I'm not saying the city shouldn't, if people value this group and whatever work they do (do they?) in the community. I'm asking why the city is required to do this...
Originally posted by Kidicious
I have a hard time beleiving that they don't care about it though.
Based on? It can't be on how well the maintained something they claimed was so precious to them.
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Originally posted by Arrian
Why was it a huge mistake and poor judgment?
Because breaking promises like hat is bound to have consequences. By pulling the carpet under the young the council created these riots and violence, polarised the citizens and radicalised the youth even further. Not exactly the ideal diplomatic outcome. That is just not how you run a city.
Comment