The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Leftist youth groups conduct street battles with police in Copenhagen
I'll give you 3 guesses, but you should only need 1.
Utopia
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
I'll give you 3 guesses, but you should only need 1.
I only need one-- a very nasty nasty system that I hope never to experience
Kid you criticize "money" to harm others but you really should consider resources to harm others as the test. I belive that the use of physical intimidation to coerce a political enemy is at least as objectionable as most uses of money ( other than the hiring of people to do the violence--- and no I do not mean police )
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Kidtopia maybe but my fear that harming a political enemy would include I don't know-- broadcasting my own views or putting up a billboard or circulating leaflets-- all take some money
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Advertizing is not harmfull in that way, although most of it is crap.
Do you know the "rat" ad's that the nazis made ?
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Originally posted by Flubber
Kid you criticize "money" to harm others but you really should consider resources to harm others as the test. I belive that the use of physical intimidation to coerce a political enemy is at least as objectionable as most uses of money ( other than the hiring of people to do the violence--- and no I do not mean police )
Who has been physically intimidated?
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Just a minor detail - the gov there spends a lot of money on fighting opponent views, so it's a no go.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Just a minor detail - the gov there spends a lot of money on fighting opponent views, so it's a no go.
The government has no opponents, and is universally loved.
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Kidtopia maybe but my fear that harming a political enemy would include I don't know-- broadcasting my own views or putting up a billboard or circulating leaflets-- all take some money
Just make sure to pick up your trash.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
No one wrt this comment-- You talked generally about finding the use of "money" as objectionable to harm a political enemy.
I say if you go down that route you have to consider not only "money" but "resources" which would include money , buildings, cars, political goodwill and people.
I mean if it was wrong for someone to buy a building away from an enemy would it not be equally wrong to
1. use political influence to deny them renovation permits
2. use people to blockade said building etc etc
Just clarifying the idea that something can't only be BAD if MONEY causes it
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Comment