Tweet
Originally posted by BlackCat
and under wich kind of system would such be impossible ?
and under wich kind of system would such be impossible ?
-
I'll give you 3 guesses, but you should only need 1.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
I am just curious how broad your definition of harm is.Originally posted by Kidicious
I don't think groups should be able to use their money to harm their political enemies or people they hate.
Should a group be able to advertise with messages that are against the message of their "political enemy" ( assume no slander or libel).You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
UtopiaOriginally posted by Kidicious
I'll give you 3 guesses, but you should only need 1.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
I only need one-- a very nasty nasty system that I hope never to experienceOriginally posted by Kidicious
I'll give you 3 guesses, but you should only need 1.
Kid you criticize "money" to harm others but you really should consider resources to harm others as the test. I belive that the use of physical intimidation to coerce a political enemy is at least as objectionable as most uses of money ( other than the hiring of people to do the violence--- and no I do not mean police )
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
Advertizing is not harmfull in that way, although most of it is crap.Originally posted by Flubber
I am just curious how broad your definition of harm is.
Should a group be able to advertise with messages that are against the message of their "political enemy" ( assume no slander or libel).I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Kidtopia maybe but my fear that harming a political enemy would include I don't know-- broadcasting my own views or putting up a billboard or circulating leaflets-- all take some moneyOriginally posted by BlackCat
Utopia
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
Under this kind.Originally posted by BlackCat
and under wich kind of system would such be impossible ?
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
-
Do you know the "rat" ad's that the nazis made ?Originally posted by Kidicious
Advertizing is not harmfull in that way, although most of it is crap.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Ahh good-- disregard my following post thenOriginally posted by Kidicious
Advertizing is not harmfull in that way, although most of it is crap.You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
Who has been physically intimidated?Originally posted by Flubber
Kid you criticize "money" to harm others but you really should consider resources to harm others as the test. I belive that the use of physical intimidation to coerce a political enemy is at least as objectionable as most uses of money ( other than the hiring of people to do the violence--- and no I do not mean police )
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Just a minor detail - the gov there spends a lot of money on fighting opponent views, so it's a no go.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven WeinbergComment
-
Hey, no one made them believe that ****.Originally posted by BlackCat
Do you know the "rat" ad's that the nazis made ?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Originally posted by BlackCat
Just a minor detail - the gov there spends a lot of money on fighting opponent views, so it's a no go.
The government has no opponents, and is universally loved.
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
-
Just make sure to pick up your trash.Originally posted by Flubber
Kidtopia maybe but my fear that harming a political enemy would include I don't know-- broadcasting my own views or putting up a billboard or circulating leaflets-- all take some money
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
No one wrt this comment-- You talked generally about finding the use of "money" as objectionable to harm a political enemy.Originally posted by Kidicious
Who has been physically intimidated?
I say if you go down that route you have to consider not only "money" but "resources" which would include money , buildings, cars, political goodwill and people.
I mean if it was wrong for someone to buy a building away from an enemy would it not be equally wrong to
1. use political influence to deny them renovation permits
2. use people to blockade said building etc etc
Just clarifying the idea that something can't only be BAD if MONEY causes itYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
Comment