Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I miss Ted Striker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Wow, a real 100% endorsement of the theory.


    I submit that any sane person would outright dismiss the theory as loony.

    Comment


    • #77
      You might think he's insane, I think he's just too open-minded

      I submit that any sane person would outright dismiss the theory as loony.
      I submit that ~400 years ago, Galileo was sentenced to jail because any sane person did outright dismiss the theory of Earth revolving around the Sun instead of the opposite as loony.

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: You might think he's insane, I think he's just too open-minded

        Originally posted by VJ

        I submit that ~400 years ago, Galileo was sentenced to jail because any sane person did outright dismiss the theory of Earth revolving around the Sun instead of the opposite as loony.
        No. They were religious, therefore not sane - therefore loonies...
        Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: You might think he's insane, I think he's just too open-minded

          Originally posted by VJ

          I submit that ~400 years ago, Galileo was sentenced to jail because any sane person did outright dismiss the theory of Earth revolving around the Sun instead of the opposite as loony.
          They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -Carl Sagan

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by MOBIUS
            And good riddance to JohnT, that's one donkey down
            Unfortunately, rather, that's one elephant down.
            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

            Comment


            • #81
              I don't think you understood what I meant...

              Is the problem in my English or your brains, MOBIUS? Or are you trying to be sarcastic?
              Last edited by RGBVideo; February 25, 2007, 20:26.

              Comment


              • #82
                None of those are mutually exclusive propositions.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #83
                  Is "you all" good english or should I just say "you" when I mean all of you?
                  I need a foot massage

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: I don't think you understood what I meant...

                    Originally posted by VJ
                    Is the problem in my English or your brains, MOBIUS? Or are you trying to be sarcastic?
                    Think of it as a PHd for the stupid...
                    Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by DanS


                      Unfortunately, rather, that's one elephant down.
                      Donkies, Elephants - you're all asses to me...

                      The only difference between Democrats and Republicans, is that the Democrats are only slightly less loathsome...
                      Is it me, or is MOBIUS a horrible person?

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
                        Is "you all" good english or should I just say "you" when I mean all of you?
                        either is fine. most just say you.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by DanS


                          Unfortunately, rather, that's one elephant down.
                          He was losing the plot though.

                          There was a thread I was trading barbs with a couple of Yanks and JT stormed in, spit up at me about being anti-American and proceeded to post links to a half dozen threads where I was either engaged in 1812 slagging or was being supportive of something or other American.
                          (\__/)
                          (='.'=)
                          (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
                            Is "you all" good english or should I just say "you" when I mean all of you?
                            "Ye."
                            THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                            AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                            AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                            DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              "YO"
                              The Wizard of AAHZ

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by VJ
                                I wasn't sure whether Ted actually did believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories because I didn't read the threads in full and thought they would've already been auto-deleted because of their age.
                                1) He defended a guy who posts stuff saying that 9/11 was a "false flag" opperation by the US government.

                                2) He refused to consider the evidence supporting the fact that it wasn't a secret opperation by the government, planes actually did hit the WTC/Pentagon, etc.

                                What conclusion are we supposed to draw from this?
                                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X