Originally posted by Spiffor
That I can agree with. Howveer, I haven't been used to Plato writing things like that, and I remain worried about it.
Huh?
I was talking about Plato's "teaching a lesson" ramblings. NOT about Israel's actual strategy. The only moment I spoke about Israel in my reply (though, upon re-reading it, it isn't clear enough), was to say that his support for Israel creates strong emotions, and that these emotions lead him to say such tripe.
I don't think his post mirrors Israel's strategy, fortunately. Because the logic he presented (which is not the focus of Israel in this war IMO) is ucking murderous. Any force that follows such logics and acts on it would deserve to be called terorirstic.
Originally posted by notyoueither
Plato lashed out emotionally at emotional images.
You took the bait
Plato lashed out emotionally at emotional images.
You took the bait
That I can agree with. Howveer, I haven't been used to Plato writing things like that, and I remain worried about it.
and went full steam ahead with the propaganda. You've fallen into the reactionary camp of criticizing Israel for doing what the government of Isreal deemed necessary in the face of provokation that would lead any nation on Earth to war with a neighbour.
Huh?
I was talking about Plato's "teaching a lesson" ramblings. NOT about Israel's actual strategy. The only moment I spoke about Israel in my reply (though, upon re-reading it, it isn't clear enough), was to say that his support for Israel creates strong emotions, and that these emotions lead him to say such tripe.
I don't think his post mirrors Israel's strategy, fortunately. Because the logic he presented (which is not the focus of Israel in this war IMO) is ucking murderous. Any force that follows such logics and acts on it would deserve to be called terorirstic.
Stop the presses!
Comment