Originally posted by Colon™
LOTM, to me it's more of a question whether the reaction is proportionate, rather than whether we're using the right terminology. You almost make it seem as if had the PA officially declared war upon Israel, and had it been helding the soldier within its official capacity as government, there wouldn't have any reason for such a large scale military operation. If we're going with the hostage-taking anology, when was the last time a military launched tanks and bombed civilian infrastructure in order to free hostages? Isn't this usually more of a special-ops job?
LOTM, to me it's more of a question whether the reaction is proportionate, rather than whether we're using the right terminology. You almost make it seem as if had the PA officially declared war upon Israel, and had it been helding the soldier within its official capacity as government, there wouldn't have any reason for such a large scale military operation. If we're going with the hostage-taking anology, when was the last time a military launched tanks and bombed civilian infrastructure in order to free hostages? Isn't this usually more of a special-ops job?
Well I was responding spefically to a point about terminology.
From what Ive read about special ops, they can be used optimally in conjunction with conventional forces, and Id be surprised if the IDF wasnt also using spec ops.
In Israel, from I can gather, the basic question is what to do about the future. Few Israelis think theres any prospect of negotiating with Hamas. Olmert, who stands behind the withdrawl from Gaza, has proposed withdrawing from most of the West Bank at some point in the not too distant future. A unilateral withdrawl to more defensible positions. Possibly with the assertion that the point of withdrawl would be the new permanent boundary. The Israeli Right - the Likud - is staunchly opposed to any further unilateral withdrawls, and points to the continuing violence coming out of Gaza to assert that withdrawl from the West Bank would only make things worse, and to attack the Olmert govt as weak. Olmert has engaged in what most Israelis think of as restraint - focusing on counter battery fire in Gaza (hitting points from which rockets are fired at Israel) and attacking mainly Islamic Jihad operatives. As Hamas has escalated its attacks, they have also targeted Hamas military operatives, but have refrained from attacking Hamas political leaders. And have refrained from entering Gaza. And continuing to reach out to Abbas, and to talk to the EU about ways to make the economic sanctions less harmful to Pal civilians. The kidnapping was the straw that broke the camels back - the govt of Israel could not accept this without doing their utmost to get Shalit back, including conventional as well as spec op activity, and if its seen as a big response - well maybe its time the Pal street learned that Israel left Gaza out of choice, and wasnt chased out by Hamas, as Hamas claims.
Comment