Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Eh. I find border security concerns regarding terrorism pretty silly, given that the only man who's tried to cross a border into the US for the purposes of terrorism (rather than at a port of entry from overseas) was immediately detained.
Eh. I find border security concerns regarding terrorism pretty silly, given that the only man who's tried to cross a border into the US for the purposes of terrorism (rather than at a port of entry from overseas) was immediately detained.
As long as the principle exporters of terrorists are outside North America, said exporters must compare the costs/risks of going direct to the USA, vs going to Canada and then crossing the border. Let cost/risk of going by air to Canada = C(air can) Let Cost/risk of going by air to USA = C(air USA) Let cost of crossing the border north to south = C(Can/USA)
As long as C(air can) + C(Can/USA) is lgreater than C(air USA) it makes sense to go direct to the USA. Even if C(air can) is less than C(air USA) and even i C(can/USA) is less than it should be.
But now lets assume that Canada doesnt have to import terrorists from Europe or the ME, but manufactures them in Toronto. At this point the low value of C(Can/USA) may become more important.
But the recent arrests are two edged. They show Canada has a vibrant manufacturing process for terrorists. But they also show Canada has a strong demand for terrorists, so the local manufacturers wanted to use all their product locally, and continue to cede the US market to non-North American suppliers (and the occasional low grade made in USA source). Now given this latter fact, I would tend to agree its unlikely that we will see many terrorists shipped south anytime soon, but if the demand in Canada were ever to drop, that could change.

Comment