Originally posted by Kontiki
None. Like Che said, they're not going to be able to maintain or upgrade them, and it's not like they have the pilots and massive support network to use them to the best of their abilities anyway.
The relative quality of a current front line US fighter and a current front line Russian fighter is overrated when it comes to combat anyway. The training and quality of your pilots, radar, intelligence, AWACS, ground crew, availability of spare parts, ability to continually upgrade etc. are all more important. I mean seriously, suppose Iraq had F-15s and F-16 during the 1991 Gulf War and the US had Russian planes, but everything else was the same. I strongly doubt the US would have lost even one more plane, or had any more difficult a time achieving air dominance.
None. Like Che said, they're not going to be able to maintain or upgrade them, and it's not like they have the pilots and massive support network to use them to the best of their abilities anyway.
The relative quality of a current front line US fighter and a current front line Russian fighter is overrated when it comes to combat anyway. The training and quality of your pilots, radar, intelligence, AWACS, ground crew, availability of spare parts, ability to continually upgrade etc. are all more important. I mean seriously, suppose Iraq had F-15s and F-16 during the 1991 Gulf War and the US had Russian planes, but everything else was the same. I strongly doubt the US would have lost even one more plane, or had any more difficult a time achieving air dominance.
Airframes are perhaps the least important aspect of the modern fighter (save stealth). Its all in the electronics both in the fighter and in the support aircraft.
Comment