Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Daily Show or Colbert Report?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
    Bring back that insufferable ass Kilborne.


    Colbert is similar to Kilborne in that they both could play spot-on caricatures of the figures in the media they were trying to parody. Stewart can't play anyone other than himself, for better or for worse.
    Exactly the problem with the Daily Show, but also a reason to consider the two apples and oranges due to different comedic styles. The Daily Show (at least currently) is satire, while the Colbert Report is genuine parody.
    Unbelievable!

    Comment


    • #17
      damn otbot
      Unbelievable!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Darius871


        Exactly the problem with the Daily Show, but also a reason to consider the two apples and oranges due to different comedic styles. The Daily Show (at least currently) is satire, while the Colbert Report is genuine parody.
        You can be both satire and parody. Colbert manages both all the time. Stewart manages both on rare occasions.
        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
        Stadtluft Macht Frei
        Killing it is the new killing it
        Ultima Ratio Regum

        Comment


        • #19
          Jon Stewart will always have a place in my heart for his Bush imitation, but it's getting old.
          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
          Stadtluft Macht Frei
          Killing it is the new killing it
          Ultima Ratio Regum

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by KrazyHorse
            You can be both satire and parody. Colbert manages both all the time. Stewart manages both on rare occasions.
            Of course, as parody is a subcategory of satire IIUC. I find parody funnier myself so Colbert gets the vote, but it's more apples and oranges IMO.
            Unbelievable!

            Comment


            • #21
              No. Parody is simply an imitation of style in an inappropriate manner. The humour is drawn from this incongruity.

              Satire is any work which ridicules the weaknesses of its subject(s).

              A parody may not be satirical. For instance, "Amish Paradise" is an obvious parody of "Gangster's Paradise", but it is not very satirical. It makes no real criticisms of the original song, its themes or its authors, nor does it criticise the Amish. It does not hold up the flaws in its subjects to ridicule. It is merely light-hearted entertainment based on the humour in the juxtaposition of gangsta rap with the Amish.

              Satire is, of course, not necessarily parody. "This Hour has 22 Minutes" in Canada, for instance, is not centrally parody. Jon Stewart doesn't usually engage in parody in his opening segment. Instead, he often satirizes his targets by attempting to draw ridiculous conclusions based on their reasoning. He doesn't copy mannerisms, details, etc. which are things you expect from a parody.

              The Colbert Report is 100% parody, but is also mainly satire. Stephen Colbert acts like a caricature of modern, especially right-wing cable television political/news commentators. His parody is also satire, since it ridicules the techniques of this group of people. He plays on their cheap patriotism, disdain for complexity and egotism. Some of the parody ventures into the ridiculous (Colbert's inexplicable loathing of bears), and is not properly satire (unless you believe his subjects hold similar psychological fixations).
              Last edited by KrazyHorse; April 7, 2006, 15:24.
              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
              Stadtluft Macht Frei
              Killing it is the new killing it
              Ultima Ratio Regum

              Comment


              • #22
                Wow. I feel like I'm in a high-school English class again. I haven't thought about details like this since then...
                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                Killing it is the new killing it
                Ultima Ratio Regum

                Comment


                • #23
                  The problem with the Daily Show is that the replacements for great "correspondants" like the Stevens Colbert and Carrell are sub-part at best. I don't like the new guy with the glasses, Cordry the younger is nowhere as good as his brother, and the one with the Roman chin just pisses me off. The only funny new one they have is Dimitri Martin, the Hip correspondant or something like that.

                  But Jon kicks ass, as do the headlines.

                  Oh, and giving credit where credit is due: that was a great explanation of the differences between Satire and Parody, KH. (edit: x-post)
                  "I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
                  ^ The Poly equivalent of:
                  "I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Good writing, parody and satire combined are often an unstoppable combination. Voltaire's works absolutely eviscerated his subjects. Colbert manages to do the same quite regularly.
                    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                    Stadtluft Macht Frei
                    Killing it is the new killing it
                    Ultima Ratio Regum

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by KrazyHorse
                      No. Parody is simply an imitation of style in an inappropriate manner. The humour is drawn from this incongruity.

                      Satire is any work which ridicules the weaknesses of its subject(s).

                      A parody may not be satirical. For instance, "Amish Paradise" is an obvious parody of "Gangster's Paradise", but it is not very satirical. It makes no real criticisms of the original song, its themes or its authors, nor does it criticise the Amish. It does not hold up the flaws in its subjects to ridicule. It is merely light-hearted entertainment based on the humour in the juxtaposition of gangsta rap with the Amish.

                      Satire is, of course, not necessarily parody. "This Hour has 22 Minutes" in Canada, for instance, is not centrally parody. Jon Stewart doesn't usually engage in parody in his opening segment. Instead, he often satirizes his targets by attempting to draw ridiculous conclusions based on their reasoning. He doesn't copy mannerisms, details, etc. which are things you expect from a parody.

                      The Colbert Report is 100% parody, but is also mainly satire. Stephen Colbert acts like a caricature of modern, especially right-wing cable television political/news commentators. His parody is also satire, since it ridicules the techniques of this group of people. He plays on their cheap patriotism, disdain for complexity and egotism. Some of the parody ventures into the ridiculous (Colbert's inexplicable loathing of bears), and is not properly satire (unless you believe his subjects hold similar psychological fixations).
                      Damn, that's what I get for relying on Wikipedia.

                      In contemporary usage, parody is a form of satire that imitates another work of art in order to ridicule it.

                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody
                      Unbelievable!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Might be true in contemporary usage.

                        These are pretty fine distinctions we're talking about. Plus humour is notoriously difficult to deconstruct.
                        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                        Stadtluft Macht Frei
                        Killing it is the new killing it
                        Ultima Ratio Regum

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Both are great.

                          Hard to pick one. Gotta go with The Daily Show though.

                          At times, Colbert tries too hard, and forces it. And as funny as TCR is, it's not reached the level of "can't miss TV" for me. I think Jon Stewart is naturally funny, whereas Colbert just... I don't know... seems like he's trying too hard sometimes.

                          Maybe that has to do with experience? I think Colbert will refine his act as things progress.

                          But regardless of which one I think is better, I think that both shows are awesome. It's great to have The Daily Show on, then right after, see the Colbert Report.

                          Comedy Central finally has a great show to follow TDS. That much is certain.
                          To us, it is the BEAST.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            no time to watch tv. banana option for me.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Is this one of those US club threads? I have no idea what you are talking about.

                              Maybe it's time to start another 'Allo 'Allo thread

                              Within weeks they'll be re-opening the shipyards
                              And notifying the next of kin
                              Once again...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Pretty much my sentiments Hueij...
                                Speaking of Erith:

                                "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X