Originally posted by Velociryx
I agree completely, but would point out that, while many women MIGHT excel at a certain job, there are some jobs that women will not (and have not, historically) gravitated to in great numbers.
Why this might be the case is another question, and probably deserving of a thread in its own right, but the fact that it IS so, and calling attention to it, is certainly not sexist.
-=Vel=-
I agree completely, but would point out that, while many women MIGHT excel at a certain job, there are some jobs that women will not (and have not, historically) gravitated to in great numbers.
Why this might be the case is another question, and probably deserving of a thread in its own right, but the fact that it IS so, and calling attention to it, is certainly not sexist.
-=Vel=-
and frankly, you shouldn't think in generalities like that
for every woman that might excel at the job, there are probably 10X as many little skinny weakling guys who can't do the job...
so why even have policies based upon gender?
have policies based upon the physical requirements of the job
gender should not even be an issue
the fact that you are so concerned about the differences between men and women leads me to think there might be some sexism going on... otherwise, why even discuss it?
everyone knows there are differences between men and women, why do you feel the need to point something out which is so blatantly obvious?
Comment