I do think we should quantify what we mean by a "genius." IMHO, a genius is someone whose brain is so fine-tuned that he can look at a simple, multiple variable problem with constraints and perform, nearly instantaneously, numerous logical transformations to solve it. In this definition, the scope, quality and quantity of one's overall work is more important than the actual influence of individual ideas. By this definition the list above should be amended as follows:
Strike Aristotle, Napoleon, Jesus (not to be sacriligeous, but being omniscient excludes Him from this poll), Darwin, Plato, Shakespeare and Tesla,
Keep Einstein (with reservations, his rejection of quantum indeterminacy is glaring), Mozart, Newton and Da Vinci (benefit of the doubt),
Add J.S. Bach, Orlando di Lassus, C.F. Gauss, Leonhard Euler, Archimedes, J.C. Maxwell, Niels Bohr, Bertrand Russell, Richard Feynman and John Neumann.
From my list, I am torn between Bach, Euler and Maxwell.
Strike Aristotle, Napoleon, Jesus (not to be sacriligeous, but being omniscient excludes Him from this poll), Darwin, Plato, Shakespeare and Tesla,
Keep Einstein (with reservations, his rejection of quantum indeterminacy is glaring), Mozart, Newton and Da Vinci (benefit of the doubt),
Add J.S. Bach, Orlando di Lassus, C.F. Gauss, Leonhard Euler, Archimedes, J.C. Maxwell, Niels Bohr, Bertrand Russell, Richard Feynman and John Neumann.
From my list, I am torn between Bach, Euler and Maxwell.
Comment