The Terrorism Test

[SlowwHand]

Damn it, I don't want to die. And I don't want you to die. So: this test will measure, in 3 variables, how "risky" your life is. That is, how much you expose yourself to the dreaded (1) nuclear, (2) biological, and (3) conventional terrorist attacks. Maybe it will even convince you not to visit NYC.

This test isn't really a joke. Despite my reputation for making silly tests (The 3 Variable Funny Test & The Would You Have Been a Nazi Test), I'm actually quite serious when it comes to terrorism. The questions on this test DO correlate to risk, in obvious ways.

I think you'll find the results compelling.

My score.

Risk:
52% NUCLEAR
56% BIOLOGICAL
27% CONVENTIONAL

Your above scores indicate your relative risk in each of the 3 main types of terrorism. A score above 50% means you are living with the real possibility of death by that type of terrorism. A score above 75% represents extreme danger. Below 25% means you are most likely safe.

Actually a pretty good test.

The Terrorism Test

[Pekka]

And fairly accurate too :hmm:

80% NUCLEAR
40% BIOLOGICAL
52% CONVENTIONAL

[Lawrence of Arabia]

69 nuke
77 bio
93 conventional

but i dont think thats right.

[Lul Thyme]

I am not even going to read the test.
Nobody has ever been the victim of nuclear terrorism.
Even expert don't really know how likely it is to happen anywhere say within the next 10 years.
Yet this guy can tell that most of you are in extreme or near extreme danger of dying by nuclear terrorism.
This is just fear mongering.

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Pekka
And fairly accurate too :hmm:

80% NUCLEAR[snip]

[Kuciwalker]

Bleh. I already know I'm probably in the highest risk category for nukes, though I have no idea how much risk that represents.

[SlowwHand]

As opposed to the Nazi test? I thought this accurate.

[Spiffor]

Just took it. Pure crap test

[SlowwHand]

Ok.
You're so ****ed up. "What kind of Star Wars character are you", is less accurate? Don't take it, like I care a lot.

[Dr Strangelove]

Hah!

4% Nuclear
26% Biological
6% Conventional

-Little do they realise that the main supplier of nuclear fuel for the US navy on the east coast is located merely 10 miles from my home.

[Pekka]

Sloww, I don't see how these percentages are accurate. 100% would mean it happened, yes? So this suggest I have 20% to escape nuclear attack?!

The questions it bases these are, do you live in a city, is it a port, are there malls, amusement parks.. you know..

and then biological and chemical, do you handshake people.

And what does running fast and having a gun have to do with not getting attacked by nukes and stuff?

And for the most of us, it'll be around 50/50 give or take a few.. I see that as.. fairly HIGH odds for attack .

[Mercator]

56% NUCLEAR
60% BIOLOGICAL
38% CONVENTIONAL

OMGOMG!!!1! I'm gonna die!

And finally: do you have a job that requires opening lots of mail?

No, but I have a job closing lots of mail.

[Kontiki]

Guess I'm going to die soon:

89% nuclear
69% biological
92% conventional

[SlowwHand]

Look, guys. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. Being so much smarter than ever one else, as some of you like to think you are.

Nowhere does it say it's probable or even likely. What it says is IF THERE WAS, what are the chance of it happening where you are living ?

Think some of you are just, I don't know, weird.

[Koyaanisqatsi]

0% NUCLEAR
30% BIOLOGICAL
2% CONVENTIONAL