The Terrorism Test

[reismark]

I'm so dead if Al Qaeda ever strikes again.

96% Nuclear
88% Biological
94% Conventional

[Lorizael]

TO REDUCE CONVENTIONAL DEATH ODDS:
- Avoid exploding bombs

Thank you.

I was slightly above fifty percent on all three categories.

[Max Webster]

8% NUCLEAR
23% BIOLOGICAL
15% CONVENTIONAL

[Gangerolf]

84% NUCLEAR
70% BIOLOGICAL
65% CONVENTIONAL

ok...

[Tattila the Hun]

Well, should a bomb go of in your vicinity, you can escape unharmed or with light injuries. You might not catch ebola, or sarin poisoning, if chem weapons are included.

But I'm pretty sure, that if someone detonates a nuke in vicinity, you're toast, and I'm pretty sure everyone's nuclear number should be 100%, except for Pekka, because he is tough as nails.



Oh.
40% NUCLEAR
60% BIOLOGICAL
25% CONVENTIONAL

Just means I need to get out more.

[Lul Thyme]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
As opposed to the Nazi test? I thought this accurate.

I don't know about the Nazi test or about the Star Wars test.
The fact that there are crappier test doesnt make this one good.

Also, if a test is so completly BS then it can sort of pass as funny (as I could imagine a Star Wars character could).

This one gives actual percentage, which are percentage of what exactly?
75% of what?
Say I get 100% what does that mean?
and 0%? I'm immune to radioactivity?

[Lul Thyme]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
Look, guys. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. Being so much smarter than ever one else, as some of you like to think you are.

Nowhere does it say it's probable or even likely. What it says is IF THERE WAS, what are the chance of it happening where you are living ?

Think some of you are just, I don't know, weird.

No matter how you play with the wording, won't make more sense.

I'm using your new wording.

So now, if there is a nuclear attack, it will happen somewhere so that something like 50-70% percent of the people that took this test are living?

Feel free to try yet another wording.

I will reiterate that since no instance of anything close to nuclear terrorism has happened, I could argue that the preferred mean of delivery will be for terrorist to go to a nuclear plant, and take control a engineer a meltdown or something similar, not a portable suitcase bomb as many ppl often assume.

This would totally change the percentages as now probably victims would be ppl who live near plants, say in France, while living in most big urban areas would be really safe...

The numbers the test gives are meaningless since we really have no idea who REALLY is more at risk from nuclear attacks even less a precise enough idea to somewhat quantify it....


EDIT:
If you say, this is just a fun meaningless test to laugh and get +0s, then I can relate.
If you are trying to convey that this test has some meaningful information, then I will continue to strongly disagree.

[Odin]

21% on nuclear
3% on biological
25% on conventional

[Six Thousand Year Old Man]

92% NUCLEAR
56% BIOLOGICAL
68% CONVENTIONAL

I work at ground zero, apparently.

[Sandman]

You'd think the human race had never conquered infectious disease, with those biological figures.

[Dinner]

That test was such a joke!

OMG THE TERRORISTS ARE GOING TO POISON THE WATER!!!!! The author should read about dilution.

[Az]

You scored higher than 98% on biological

cool

[Donegeal]

Pretty safe:

44% NUCLEAR
46% BIOLOGICAL
40% CONVENTIONAL

[Zevico]

If that test wasn't a joke I'll kill myself.

[Imran Siddiqui]

40% NUCLEAR
43% BIOLOGICAL
40% CONVENTIONAL