The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
my undergrad occasionally had special swedish style dishes
they were all really scary
JM
Jon Miller- I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Originally posted by Oerdin
[...]Norweigens weren't even seen as a seporate people until the end of the 19th century (up to that point they were either Danes or Swedes depending upon who you asked[...]
4 pages and nobody cared to point out that that is 1000% wrong (not just the spelling of the first word)?
Norway and Norwegians have been a separate country and people since at least the 9th century. Maybe you were confused by the fact that it was united with Denmark and Sweden between 1397 and 1905. No worries.
Was it because the two royal families were to powerful and had to long of a history trying to dominate each other?
I think this is the main reason. This is definately why the Kalmar union failed anywayz.
And yep Scandinavian cuisine can be quite scary. (Especially certain fish dishes (soaked, dried, fermented, cured, etc).) But it usually doesn't taste too bad.
Gangerolf, the point was Norweigens weren't ethnically or linguistically different. They were basically the same people and the creation of "Norweigen" was a great nationalist endever post 1905 or so I've been told. Supposedly the newly independent government tried to artificially create a sense of Norweigenness to prevent future reobsorption of Norway by Sweden or Denmark.
There have always been 3 separate Scandinavian peoples. Norway isn't a 19th century invention...
But it is correct that there was a national/romantic renaissance thing going on since the mid 19th century and all the way up to the 1930s I guess and that few people put much emphasis on nationality before then. Just like in many other parts of Europe.
I don't see the connection between your interpretation and my statement.
Have you considered visiting a doctor?
YOUR ARGUMENT WAS that since Sweden (nation X) eventually lost it's great power status because of one battle in a war, battle of Poltava (battle Y), it was never a great power anyway.
When we place Nazi Germany as nation X and Stalingrad as battle Y; it leads to Nazi Germany never being a great power anyway.
Sweden didn't lose the empire at Poltava, but it was the start of a long slipping slope that eventually led to the loss of Finland 100 years later.
You were in southern Poland before Poltava. You retreated all the way back to modern Sweden (ie. even retreated from Finland) after that.
Originally posted by Oerdin
Gangerolf, the point was Norweigens weren't ethnically or linguistically different. They were basically the same people and the creation of "Norweigen" was a great nationalist endever post 1905 or so I've been told. Supposedly the newly independent government tried to artificially create a sense of Norweigenness to prevent future reobsorption of Norway by Sweden or Denmark.
Germany whenever it was somewhat united, has always been a pre-eminent European power, if not a world power. To pretend it was only a great power during Nazi-Germany is a bit silly.
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
I'm not sure how powerful a united Scandinavia would be... Maybe it would make the Baltic sea a "mare nostrum"... Maybe even the North Atlantic as well. But then again it is surrounded by more powerful nations. Germany, Britain and Russia. Even Poland has more people than Scandinavia.
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
Well English and Scots "hate" each other. Same with e.g. Bavarians and "Fish Heads" in Germany. They still stick together.
At least everyone in Scandinavia is the same religion (Lutheran) so there is less chance that a united "Norden" would end up like Yugoslavia with genocide and stuff.
Originally posted by Gangerolf
Killing baby Swedes is fun.
Well English and Scots "hate" each other. Same with e.g. Bavarians and "Fish Heads" in Germany. They still stick together.
At least everyone in Scandinavia is the same religion (Lutheran) so there is less chance that a united "Norden" would end up like Yugoslavia with genocide and stuff.
With the exception of the Sami. I've seen 'Pathfinder'- we know what you lot were doing to entertain yourselves before Strindberg, Ibsen and Hans Christian Andersen came along- or shopping trips to the Metro Centre.
Attached Files
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
They're Lutheran too. Well quite a few are members of the fundamentalist Christian Laestadian movement. Most are of course quite areligous, just like most normal people in Scandinavia.
Comment