Up until the 16th century the Kalmar Union created a unified, if highly decentralized, Kingdom of Scandinavia made up of Kingdoms of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the Duchy of Finland. Linguistically Danes, Swedes, Norweigens, Icelanders, and Greenlanders were one people (Finns were linguistically different but historically associated with Scandinavia as were Baltics at various times though they got traded between Sweden, Russia, and Germany) and Norweigens weren't even seen as a seporate people until the end of the 19th century (up to that point they were either Danes or Swedes depending upon who you asked and those two groups were really two different factions of the same people).
So in the 19th century when other ethnic groups were forming their own states (Germany, Italy, various Balkan states) why didn't Scandinavia unite? Was it because the two royal families were to powerful and had to long of a history trying to dominate each other? Was it conservative short sightedness? Was it a lack of common identity which Italians and Germans were able to find but the Scandinavians could not? Why did Scandinavia decide to be a group of little powerless countries instead of a united and strong country?
So in the 19th century when other ethnic groups were forming their own states (Germany, Italy, various Balkan states) why didn't Scandinavia unite? Was it because the two royal families were to powerful and had to long of a history trying to dominate each other? Was it conservative short sightedness? Was it a lack of common identity which Italians and Germans were able to find but the Scandinavians could not? Why did Scandinavia decide to be a group of little powerless countries instead of a united and strong country?
Comment