Apolyton Fantasy Football - League One - Discussion Thread

[Kidlicious]

No way will Culpepper get 700 points. Not even you believe that, and you know it.

[Kidlicious]

My team is set to kick ass. I got Kevin Curtis now too. Get ready for hell boys!

[Imran Siddiqui]

Originally posted by Kidicious
Oh, let's see he would have gotten 500 last year for sure if he didn't get injured, and if he would have had a healthy offensive line he would have gotten 600. I'd say that 500 is pretty conservative.

Suuuuuree. You do realize the projections are based on the whole year right? Like, all 16 games?

Keep sipping on the Kool-Aid.

No way will Culpepper get 700 points. Not even you believe that, and you know it.

But it's in the Yahoo projections!! It must be gold (according to you)!

[Imran Siddiqui]

Though I wonder why in the Hell am I arguing against someone who dropped Josh Brown as his kicker for Nate Kaeding!! YES, that Kaeding!! Jeez-Louise!

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui

No way will Culpepper get 700 points. Not even you believe that, and you know it.

But it's in the Yahoo projections!! It must be gold (according to you)!

Culpepper's projected fantasy points for the year is 588. What is wrong with you?

Though I wonder why in the Hell am I arguing against someone who dropped Josh Brown as his kicker for Nate Kaeding!! YES, that Kaeding!! Jeez-Louise!

They both suck. I'm going by the projections for week 1. Yes, I look at those, especially about kickers and others who I don't know about. It worked pretty good for me last year.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Culpepper's projected fantasy points for the year is 588. What is wrong with you?

I'm on the league site and under Players, and "Fan Pts" it says 670+. Where are you looking at?

They both suck.

Josh Brown is one of the better young kickers out there, who has a pretty accurate leg. Kaeding after hitting all of his kicks in the last preseason game was 0-4 and sucked in the playoffs last year. No contest.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Oh, I see where you are... where Griese is projected for 447 points... a bit low for him. Should hit 500 easily. Though Griese is projected closer to Bulger than Bulger is to Culpepper. 500 conservative for Bulger?! BWAHAH!

Btw, these projected rankings have Seattle's Darrell Jackson as the best reciever! And Randy Moss not even in the Top 10 Wideouts!!! WTF?!

And Dominick Davis as the best RB?!! With Deuce McAllister behind Ronnie Brown?!

And THIS is what you are baseing your numbers on?! THIS?!

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Oh, I see where you are... where Griese is projected for 447 points... a bit low for him. Should hit 500 easily.

You believe in miracles.

Btw, these projected rankings have Seattle's Darrell Jackson as the best reciever! And Randy Moss not even in the Top 10 Wideouts!!! WTF?!

And Dominick Davis as the best RB?!! With Deuce McAllister behind Ronnie Brown?!

And THIS is what you are baseing your numbers on?! THIS?!

I have no idea why you have a problem using the database. It was designed for the average moron to use. Again, nothing you say here is true.

[Imran Siddiqui]

You believe in miracles.

I believe in reality.

I have no idea why you have a problem using the database. It was designed for the average moron to use. Again, nothing you say here is true.

Sorry bub, try again.

WR, Remaining Games (proj)
Rankings Projected:

D. Jackson 43
T. Owens 44
M. Harrison 46
T. Holt 50

Though I was wrong on Randy Moss... he's 51, but in another measure he's the 11th WR (proj fant pts / remaining games).

Though apparently the rankings are different under Season (proj).

Maybe there are problems with the database, because they give two seperate rankings for something measuring the same exact thing (since Remaining Games are all of them)!!

And then in Season (proj), Randy Moss has a projected ranking of 6, making him the highest ranked WR, but is the 11th WR in fan pts!! WTF?!


If we had defensive player rankings you'd see how messed up it was (Zop knows about that... FFZ was a mess with those players).

[Zopperoni]

The Yahoo projections can indeed be rather awkward at times. The most important thing, however, is that the projected ranking is based on Yahoo's default scoring system.

We use a different scoring system, so the projected fantasy points become irrelevant.

[Kidlicious]

Oh well. With kickers who knows how many points you are going to get anyway. They're all about the same. I'm wondering if I should go with the projections and play Tenn def this week instead of Philly. Tenn plays the Steelers. Philly plays at Alt.

[Kidlicious]

Ok. Those proj rankings are pretty screwed up. I see that now.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Originally posted by Kidicious
Ok. Those proj rankings are pretty screwed up. I see that now.

Yeah, that was my point . Though part of it was needling you about the QB on your favorite team (did you ever think WHY I picked Bulger?) .

[Kidlicious]

Bulger's projected number is low. Griese's is way too high. We'll see that in week 1, then you won't be able to talk smack anymore.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Cause we all know that last year Bulger had a higher passer rating and more TDs per attempt... oh wait! He didn't!



Though I LOVE how you picked Week 1. Because you didn't know that the Rams were at the 49ers that week while the Bucs were at the Vikings... noooo.. just a coincidence, I'm sure .