I guess Bush is the first politician that has ever lied...
Hmmmm... now that I think of it, every president I can remember has lied as well...
Hmmmm... and so has just about every other world leader...
Hmmmm... now that I think of it, every president I can remember has lied as well...
Hmmmm... and so has just about every other world leader...
The consequences of this lie are far worse. That is the problem. We all know that Johnson lied about the Gulf of Tonkin, and that Reagan lied about Central America. Some pretty bad **** happened because of that. But that occurred within the bounds of an international order that all the big players agreed to. That's why the US invasion of Grenada was not particularly destablising, and nor were Soviet interventions in such places as Hungary, and nor was China's invasion and occupation of Tibet. All of these were bad, but none threatened to bring down the international order, since each tended to keep its overt interventions to its own sphere of influence. Thus, was World War III averted.
Now we have a mentally incompetent president, whose advisers seem to have little grip on political reality (and the diplomatic community, including US diplomats will be the first to tell you this in private) who have basically announced that they intend to run the world by force. If you didn't get the message, they made it US policy, and if you still didn't get the message they invaded a sovereign country in defiance of world opinion to prove it. That would be OK if the US actually was capable of doing this, but it isn't. You won't take the tax hikes it would need for a start.
So we are left with going back to what the world was like before WW1 – several power blocs each with a roughly similar ideology attempting to protect themselves against the others. Now we all know what happened there. I have no idea if that will happen again, but Shrub's seeming desire to destroy the even limited authority of the UN is completely daft. The UN is far from perfect, but it, or something like it, is the only alternative to the old systems of alliances and stupidity. Sure, it has a mixed history, but that can be solely laid at the feet of the great powers, who have consistently vetoed what didn't suit them. But it is still better than the jungle.
Comment