Unfortunately there's really nothing there to psychoanalyze. Who takes a moderating job on an internet forum and spends their time policing others? Ming is the only exception I have ever met to this. Partly because he is older and has kids and has already been very successful in the advertising industry. Are you over 40 though making good money and have a family? I think not.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries voted on by conservatives
Collapse
X
-
"You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran
Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dextrose
Unfortunately there's really nothing there to psychoanalyze. Who takes a moderating job on an internet forum and spends their time policing others? Ming is the only exception I have ever met to this. Partly because he is older and has kids and has already been very successful in the advertising industry. Are you over 40 though making good money and have a family? I think not.
Comment
-
Whose DL is Dextrose?
I am tempted by saying MalevolentLight, but it isn't clear yet."I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Comment
-
Being successful in advertising makes you successful? It makes you a f*cking paraste on society, they do no useful work, they just make stuff thst use emotion to create excess demand.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bosh
I find that hard to believe. J.S. Mill was a socialist.. Someone who argues that government's only role is to remove barriers to behaviors that do not harm others is hardly a socialist
.
Isaiah Berlin sure didn't think Mill was a socialist as he complained that Mill didn't value equality and social progress and was solely for negative liberty (freedom from), but not positive liberty (freedom to).Last edited by Imran Siddiqui; June 4, 2005, 15:11.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Supporting NAMBLA is tantamount to supporting their practices.
We must ban the Klan and other organizations which may offend! Supporting their right to exist is tantamount to supporting their practices!A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Originally posted by St Leo
Originally posted by BlackCat
The worst thing is that they haven't mentioned the real dangerous books such as the bible and other kinds of religious scriptures, but of course, it's a list made of people that could be suspected of being religious.
The Bible, the Koran, and the Vedas get disqualified on the basis of not having been written in the last two centuries.
What do you suggest? Book of Mormon? Dianetics? The Kitab-i-Aqdas?
Anyway, I think that any religious book no matter when or where it is written is a great danger to humnakind, so all of your suggestions fall into the danger category.With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dextrose
Ming is the only exception I have ever met to this.
ML's DL, to be specific.(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Comment
Comment