Hu's not going to dismantle the reforms... the best he can do is try to ameliorate the massive inequalities that have crept into the system. But if he gambles with China's prosperity... he's toast.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hu a big disappointment
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ned
Che, I though sure you would have an opinion on president Hu. He, after all, is a leader in the largest nominally communist country that ever existed.Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Comment
-
Originally posted by aneeshm
I hope Hu turns more and more hardline communist as time goes . Let the reforms that were achieved go waste . Let him cause the Chinese economy to stagnate/slow down/implode . The way will be easier for India . China has acted like a **** towards India for too long now . Let communism get what communism deserves .
It wasn't until much later that I was even aware of some Sino-Indian famous rivalry. And it wasn't until MUCH later that I went online and saw it in action, at places like Urbandictionary and now, Apolyton.
Far out."lol internet" ~ AAHZ
Comment
-
Well Ali, aneeshm's a prat.Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alinestra Covelia
The funny thing about this thread is that my ex-housemate was also named Hu - we called him Hu Man Bing (true story).
And to be disappointed in HMB, you'd have to entertain expectations of... well, anything. So he never did prove disappointing, really!
My residency in China was almost entirely under Deng and Jiang, so I don't pretend to any authority about Hu. But I don't think it's really fair to call the man a "big disappointment". He's consolidated the grip of the ruling party, overseen continued breakneck growth, shaken his saber at the Japanese and Taiwanese, and extended the cordial olive branch of peaceful hegemony to India, Pakistan, Russia, and various other neighbors. I'd say that counts as status quo.
Now, if Hu had orchestrated a disastrous economic reversal, coupled with a secession of the component ethnic minorities in the northwest and Tibet, while standing helpless as foreign powers shelled and seized key port cities, disassembling the nation's production centers one by bloody one as their armies marched through the burning embers of the nation's capital singing "This is not a full-blown rape / Lo - it is merely an incident!" - THEN I might feel compelled to give gentle voice to feelings of disappointment.
Same goes if they lose to the Germans again in the World Cup like they did in 2002.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sprayber
The problem with the Chinese government (and those that try to explain thier behavior away) is that old griviences are used as excuses to grab everything and anything that they can. Franky wants the west to look over the Chinese because that is just the way they are and they can't help it. Taiwan should be given to China because way back when it was Chinese territory or it's goverment and infrastructure is somehow Chinese (hey but at least Hawaii will never be independent either) Problem with Franky's ideas is that a few million Taiwanese feel differently about it, but hey they aren't anywhere near as important as what those on the mainland are they? As long as the CCP officials in the capital feel good about themselves who cares what the people in Taiwan think. And we all know that the average Chinese peasant will be much better off with the people of Taiwan suffering the same fate as they. I think you have been playing too much SMAC Franky. Not everyone feels the need to answer to the call of the Chairman. I always liked playing the Spartans but damned if I would ever want to live in that enviroment.
And the only apology the Chinese people could really use at this point is one from it's own government. Too bad the CCP isn't as interested in those issues as they are dragging the Japanese out.
I'm tired of hearing that. I want to show people the other side of the argument (personal feelings aside). If people just take the time to try and understand the other side of the argument objectively and without personal bias, I believe there would be a GREATER global understanding of things. Unfortunately though, many people aren't willing to take the time and see things differently.
Of course, my personal feelings might not want to be what most of the people here agree with, I at least can understand the opposing point of view. Taiwan has a great government, its people enjoy a little more social freedoms. Of course I love that, who wouldn't?
But again I'll bring up history's sake and say that Taiwan IS a part of China. China has over the last couple of decades, reclaimed all it's lost lands centuries ago, and I believe that China see's itself as incomplete until it gains ALL it's lost lands.Despot-(1a) : a ruler with absolute power and authority (1b) : a person exercising power tyrannically
Beyond Alpha Centauri-Witness the glory of Sheng-ji Yang
*****Citizen of the Hive****
"...but what sane person would move from Hawaii to Indiana?" -Dis
Comment
-
Originally posted by aneeshm
Slight correction there . Who cares about other people who have traditionally been hostile to you and already stabbed you in the back once , right ?
Kinda concerned about that. Especially the Kashmir region...Despot-(1a) : a ruler with absolute power and authority (1b) : a person exercising power tyrannically
Beyond Alpha Centauri-Witness the glory of Sheng-ji Yang
*****Citizen of the Hive****
"...but what sane person would move from Hawaii to Indiana?" -Dis
Comment
-
the other side of the argument objectively and without personal bias, I believe there would be a GREATER global understanding of things
But again I'll bring up history's sake and say that Taiwan IS a part of China. China has over the last couple of decades, reclaimed all it's lost lands centuries ago, and I believe that China see's itself as incomplete until it gains ALL it's lost lands.Stop Quoting Ben
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frankychan
But again I'll bring up history's sake and say that Taiwan IS a part of China. China has over the last couple of decades, reclaimed all it's lost lands centuries ago, and I believe that China see's itself as incomplete until it gains ALL it's lost lands.
But obviously they have. Tibet, Turkestan and Vietnam.
And they still have further ambitions. In addition to Taiwan, they may want to restore
Vietnam?
Korea?http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frankychan
Ok ok, so my thoughts parallel SMAC somewhat. But taking in the BIG picture, if I lived in his utopia, I know I'd probably regret it. However, my main problem is that lots of people here in America are all like "OMG!!!11!! China is Evil cause they are Communist! They want Taiwan, Destroy them!!!"
I'm tired of hearing that. I want to show people the other side of the argument (personal feelings aside). If people just take the time to try and understand the other side of the argument objectively and without personal bias, I believe there would be a GREATER global understanding of things. Unfortunately though, many people aren't willing to take the time and see things differently.
Of course, my personal feelings might not want to be what most of the people here agree with, I at least can understand the opposing point of view. Taiwan has a great government, its people enjoy a little more social freedoms. Of course I love that, who wouldn't?
But again I'll bring up history's sake and say that Taiwan IS a part of China. China has over the last couple of decades, reclaimed all it's lost lands centuries ago, and I believe that China see's itself as incomplete until it gains ALL it's lost lands.
One thing I'd like to know, are the Chinese so damn depressed about their stature in the world that only through expansion can they be appeased. I thought only the Russians had low national self esteem issues. Are the Chinese depressed to? Should we restore Rome why we are in the business of easing National Pride issues?Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh
Comment
-
Why is it OK for a commie country to acquire "lost territories" by invasion, but not OK for any other country to do so?http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ned
Why is it OK for a commie country to acquire "lost territories" by invasion, but not OK for any other country to do so?Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sprayber
Apparently China has bad self esteem issues
So did Hitler, but Britain and France declared war. (But not on Stalin who did the same thing as Hitler, and worse.)
So did Saddam, and Britain, France and the US declared war on him when he invaded and took Kuwait.
When Britain, France and Israel took the Sinai and Suez, we told them to bug out. They did.
When the commies tried to take SV, only the US, but not the Brits and France (for obvious reasons) tried to stop them. But Johnson adopted a no win strategy.
When the commies tried to take S. Korea, the UN adopted an no victory strategy, and would have done nothing at all had the USSR not skip the Security Council meeting due to stupidity.
No one did anything about Stalin before WWII, or after.
No one did anything about Red China aggressions.
No one but the US (and perhaps the Japanese) tells the Chinese to cool it over Taiwan. However, we did nothing about Turkestan and Tibet.
The double-standard is quite apparent. Communist countries get a pass, while Western countries (including former colonies like Iraq) are held to a much higher standard. If they invade anybody, they are villified to no end.
But the commies seem to have a god-given right to invade as they please without complaint by the New York Times, the London Times and other liberal media outlets.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
Comment