Originally posted by notyoueither
How close is too close? They do the math and figure where it could reasonably fall. Nothing is in that area. They should now extend it? What? 100 miles? 1000 miles? You never know when things could go really wrong and the thing blast off toward Chile. Might want to just stop launching rockets. On second thought, we might want to slip a few payements to ensure that Ottawa is ground zero for an evernt.
How close is too close? They do the math and figure where it could reasonably fall. Nothing is in that area. They should now extend it? What? 100 miles? 1000 miles? You never know when things could go really wrong and the thing blast off toward Chile. Might want to just stop launching rockets. On second thought, we might want to slip a few payements to ensure that Ottawa is ground zero for an evernt.
The reality is that none of us on here has seen details . Some are assuming that the space guys "one in a trillion" qote is accurate while others, including myself have been assuming that the oil companies would not be considering evacuation if that was the real probability.
I just know that if the planned impact zone is within a mile, that seems awful close. If thats the zone " where it could possibly hit if everything goes wrong" then we have a different situation. But if thats the situation, why are the the oil companies so fussed?
Its a big big ocean out there and much of it is empty but theres a relatively small patch out there thats relatively busy. Aside from the Hibernia platform, there is the Terra Nova development and work being done on the Whiterose development all within less than 50 km of Hibernia. Each if these developments have exclusion zones where there don't even let shipping pass through, so caution is the norm when we are talking offshore oil development. The question is whether the oil companies are going overboard here
Comment