****ing Wolfowitz
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
World Bank
Collapse
X
-
I don't even know who she is but I'd hit it.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
I was skeptical of her but she has proven to be extremley effective in her role.
Warmongerowitz on the other hand needs to get stuffed.We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin
The US provides only a minority of the money to the world bank. It's the single largest donor but it is only a minority of the money so I don't see how you can justify your railroad mentality of my way or the highway.
Comment
-
The US is the largest share holder in the World Bank, though still a minority holder, and that's why we traditionally nominate the head of the bank. It must still be approved by the other shareholders. I'm still not following why you believe a minority share holder should be able to dictate policy to the majority of the share holders. I believe that's what you meant when you wrote "And they better do as told if they want the money to keep coming. Personally I'm all for shutting these silly things down".Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TCO
Personally I'm all for shutting these silly things down.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
OMG! Was that a reasonable statement from DinoDoc? I am beside myself.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oerdin
The US is the largest share holder in the World Bank, though still a minority holder, and that's why we traditionally nominate the head of the bank. It must still be approved by the other shareholders. I'm still not following why you believe a minority share holder should be able to dictate policy to the majority of the share holders. I believe that's what you meant when you wrote "And they better do as told if they want the money to keep coming. Personally I'm all for shutting these silly things down".
BTW, I don't think these types of aid help people much. It goes into corrupt governments and even props them up. Also the types of projects done, can be very huge and stupid. I prefer lowering our trader barriers to help people.
have you read THE UGLY AMERICAN?
Comment
Comment