So you are, essentially "Mister Windows," right? I mean, always quick to leap to the defense of Microsoft, equally quick to slam Apple, Linux, or...basically anybody that's not Microsoft.
My question is this:
Given that Microsoft, as an OS vendor, cannot compete on the basis of price with some of her rivals (Linux, most notably), then they must compete on the basis of features (which is about the only thing left, if you take price away).
Thus, what features do MS Operating Systems have that in your mind make them worth some $200 more than their freebie counterparts?
I've got a network in my home, and two of my three computers have XP on them, so this question does not come from someone with an axe to grind, by any means.
I'm just curious to know your thoughts...what is it about MS OS's that make them worth the two hundred plus bucks you gotta shell out, when there are perfectly functional OS's out there for....well...free.
-=Vel=-
My question is this:
Given that Microsoft, as an OS vendor, cannot compete on the basis of price with some of her rivals (Linux, most notably), then they must compete on the basis of features (which is about the only thing left, if you take price away).
Thus, what features do MS Operating Systems have that in your mind make them worth some $200 more than their freebie counterparts?
I've got a network in my home, and two of my three computers have XP on them, so this question does not come from someone with an axe to grind, by any means.
I'm just curious to know your thoughts...what is it about MS OS's that make them worth the two hundred plus bucks you gotta shell out, when there are perfectly functional OS's out there for....well...free.
-=Vel=-
Comment