Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

French workers fight for the right to be lazy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Kuciwalker
    That hardly qualifies as debilitating
    yes, consuming 50 hours of your week is not debilitating at all.

    Well, that is true if you live to work, rather than work to live, as was said eariler, I suppose. But then, really, who cares about the drones anyways? Concern should only be given to those people who can actually feel life.
    Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

    Do It Ourselves

    Comment


    • Can someone explain to me why you all are defending a policy that hasn't had the effect it was sold as providing and has in fact hindered the very thing it was supposed to have helped?
      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kidicious
        Exactly, but one of the reasons they build factories in China is because of the cheap labor. How can you possibly argue otherwise.
        That's not why they build in China as opposed to Africa.

        Where have I said jobs aren't going to China? In fact, that's what I did say, earlier. Jobs moving to a place != low unemployment.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by General Ludd
          yes, consuming 50 hours of your week is not debilitating at all.

          Well, that is true if you live to work, rather than work to live, as was said eariler, I suppose. But then, really, who cares about the drones anyways? Concern should only be given to those people who can actually feel life.
          How is it particularly different from 35? Why is 40 or 50 specifically bad?

          Comment


          • Yeah, even if you work 20 hours a week, you are still working to live. It's silly to you aren't, unless you are welfare check collecting do-nothing.
            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.â€
            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

            Comment


            • I work 15 hours a week . I pay all my bills and dont take any money from the government'. Yes I'm not rich... I don't care, I enjoy thoroughly every last hour of free time i have. And I don't use all the hours I got by working below the magic number of 40 hours by watching TV Imran

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Kidicious


                As I remember Oerdin makes quite a bit of money not working, and I bet DanS does too.
                I'm unemployed but I imagine I still make more then you.

                Besides I shall be employed again soon. I've got two interviews coming up next week both of which are well paying.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Locutus
                  Yet per capita we are among the wealthiest countries in the world and are also at or near the top of the ranking in terms of welfare, happiness and life expentency. We must be doing something right

                  35 hrs a week

                  30 hrs a week

                  Alexander's Horse linked to recent PPP figures and hours worked per worker per year. The Dutch worked 40% less then Americans and made a PPP $26k while Americans worked worked more but made a PPP $36k. I think on an income gained per hour of work bases the Dutch are ahead of us though the Americans still make significantly more.

                  The big losers were the Australians who worked more hours then anyone else in the 1st world but made some of the lowest incomes (something like PPP$20k).
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • trying to figure out 3rd world unemployment rates is useless - everyone is underemployed, and theres no way china has only 10% unemployment.
                    "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

                    Comment


                    • I have the exact figures Oerdin (no surprise there eh?)

                      Productivty in OECD members, measured by GDP per hour worked (2002 @ PPPs) and expressed as a % of USA:

                      1st, Norway 132%
                      2nd, Luxembourg 125%
                      3rd, France 120%
                      4th Belgium 114%
                      5th, Netherlands 109%
                      6th, Ireland 106%
                      7th, Austria 102%
                      8th, Germany 102%
                      9th, United States 100%
                      10th, Denmark 98%
                      11th, Italy 96%
                      12th, Finland 92%
                      13th, Switzerland 91%
                      14th, United Kingdom 90%
                      15th, Sweden 89%
                      16th, Australia 83%
                      17th, Canada 83%
                      18th, Spain 77%
                      19th, Japan 75%
                      20th, Iceland 72%
                      21st, New Zealand 65%
                      22nd, Greece 65%
                      23rd, Portugal 54%
                      24th, Hungary 52%
                      25th, Czech Republic 42%
                      26th, Mexico 39%
                      27th, Slovakia 39%
                      28th, Poland 38%
                      29th, South Korea 31%
                      30th, Turkey 26%

                      The full series is here
                      Last edited by el freako; February 6, 2005, 03:49.
                      19th Century Liberal, 21st Century European

                      Comment


                      • And why do I think that DanS won't agree with the 35 hour workweek either?
                        I'm not averse to a 35 hour work week in principle. In the US, we've made much larger percentage reductions in the past, after all. We moved slowly from a 6-day/12 hour daily work week business custom to a 5-day/8 hour daily work week business custom (a 45% reduction). FYI, there are still some industries that adhere to a 6-day work week.

                        However, for the last couple of decades, the decrease has taken a pause in the US, while it has continued outside the anglophone area. I question the wisdom of swimming against the tide created by the US and the emerging economies. To mix my metaphors, it's clear that no country is an island with regard to competition. In addition, the French get much more vacation than Americans, so it's not merely a question of the number of hours in a work week.

                        I also question the wisdom of mandating the change from the government. The government is large enough in France that if it instituted a 35-hour workweek for government employees, eventually that practice likely would filter through to industry, as the business climate permitted.

                        Lastly, it doesn't seem to make sense to lower the amount of time that the French work, considering that fewer workers will be supporting more retirees as the years go by. To get a good sense of what's going on, it probably would make more sense to look at this as the total number of hours worked per capita per year, which would factor in the impact of retirement and vacations.
                        Last edited by DanS; February 6, 2005, 04:55.
                        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                        Comment


                        • Uhh.... folks.... nothing stops people from taking 35 hours per week jobs here in the States, or from demanding more vacation days. And some places do offer that. The French require that BY LAW. How can that be fair? What about people who need lots of money, and want to work as many hours a week as they can (They do exist, people who have run up too much credit card debt and need to reverse themselves)?
                          Finally, someone else who got it... nothing wrong with short work-weeks if you can live with the money you got from the hours, but why not allow some people to work longer if they truly want to?

                          Comment


                          • Wow, the US is surprisingly high up on that list.
                            Visit First Cultural Industries
                            There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
                            Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

                            Comment


                            • Yet per capita we are among the wealthiest countries in the world and are also at or near the top of the ranking in terms of welfare, happiness and life expentency. We must be doing something right
                              Shell.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Kuciwalker




                                I spend more than 35 hours a week in school.
                                That's not 35 hours working, is it? Factor in time spent staring thunderstruck at the budding bodies of your female colleagues, and helpless insecurity about whether your genitals are ever going to come up to scratch, and you're looking at about 6 hours of actual work.
                                The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X