Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Europe - Thy Name is Cowardice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Europe - Thy Name is Cowardice?

    I received the following e-mail. True or Urban Legend?

    ...

    Matthias Dapfner, Chief Executive of the huge German publisher Axel Springer AG, has written a blistering attack in DIE WELT, Germany's largest daily newspaper, against the timid reaction of Europe in the face of the Islamic threat.


    EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE

    (Commentary by Mathias Dapfner CEO, Axel Springer, AG)



    A few days ago Henry Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe - your family name is appeasement." It's a phrase you can't get out of your head because it's so terribly true.



    Appeasement cost millions of Jews and non-Jews their lives as England and France, allies at the time, negotiated and hesitated too long before they noticed that Hitler had to be fought, not bound to toothless agreements.



    Appeasement legitimized and stabilized Communism in the Soviet Union, then East Germany, then all the rest of Eastern Europe where for decades, inhuman, suppressive, murderous governments were glorified as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities.



    Appeasement crippled Europe when genocide ran rampant in Kosovo, and even though we had absolute proof of ongoing mass-murder, we Europeans debated and debated and debated, and were still debating when finally the Americans had to come from halfway around the world, into Europe yet again, and do our work for us.



    Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European appeasement, camouflaged behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now countenances suicide bombings in Israel by fundamentalist Palestinians.



    Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore nearly 500,000 victims of Saddam's torture and murder machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace-movement, has the gall to issue bad grades to George Bush... Even as it is uncovered that the loudest critics of the American action in Iraq made illicit billions, no, TENS of billions, in the corrupt U.N. Oil-for-Food program.



    And now we are faced with a particularly grotesque form of appeasement... How is Germany reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere? By suggesting that we really should have a "Muslim Holiday" in Germany.



    I wish I were joking, but I am not. A substantial fraction of our (German) Government, and if the polls are to be believed, the German people, actually believe that creating an Official State "Muslim Holiday" will somehow spare us from the wrath of the fanatical Islamists.



    One cannot help but recall Britain's Neville Chamberlain waving the laughable treaty signed by Adolf Hitler, and declaring European "Peace in our time".



    What else has to happen before the European public and its political leadership get it? There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially perfidious crusade consisting of systematic attacks by fanatic Muslims, focused on civilians, directed against our free, open Western societies, and intent upon Western Civilization's utter destruction.



    It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than any of the great military conflicts of the last century - a conflict conducted by an enemy that cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures, which have proven to be, and will always be taken by the Islamists for signs of weakness.



    Only two recent American Presidents had the courage needed for anti-appeasement: Reagan and Bush.



    His American critics may quibble over the details, but we Europeans know the truth. We saw it first hand: Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War, freeing half of the German people from nearly 50 years of terror and virtual slavery. And Bush, supported only by the Social Democrat Blair, acting on moral conviction, recognized the danger in the Islamic War against democracy. His place in history will have to be evaluated after a number of years have passed.



    In the meantime, Europe sits back with charismatic self-confidence in the multicultural corner, instead of defending liberal society's values and being an attractive center of power on the same playing field as the true great powers, America and China.



    On the contrary - we Europeans present ourselves, in contrast to those "arrogant Americans", as the World Champions of "tolerance", which even (Germany's Interior Minister) Otto Schily justifiably criticizes. Why? Because we're so moral? I fear it's more because we're so materialistic, so devoid of a moral compass.



    For his policies, Bush risks the fall of the dollar, huge amounts of additional national debt, and a massive and persistent burden on the American economy - because unlike almost all of Europe, Bush realizes what is at stake - literally everything.



    While we criticize the "capitalistic robber barons" of America because they seem too sure of their priorities, we timidly defend our Social Welfare systems. Stay out of it! It could get expensive! We'd rather discuss reducing our 35-hour workweek or our dental coverage, or our 4 weeks of paid vacation... Or listen to TV pastors preach about the need to "reach out to terrorists. To understand and forgive".



    These days, Europe reminds me of an old woman who, with shaking hands, frantically hides her last pieces of jewelry when she notices a robber breaking into a neighbor's house.



    Appeasement? Europe, thy name is Cowardice.
    “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

    ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

  • #2
    Well, it's plastered all over Google news. (If the question is whether this is a real Op-Ed or not).

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't see it on news.google.com. You can never be too sure about these things nowadays.
      “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

      ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

      Comment


      • #4
        I seem to recall in my history studies a time when Europe wasn't so reticent about getting involved in th4e affairs of other people. It wasn't very pretty.

        It should be poointed out that when England and France decided to appease Germany in 1939 they immediately began to rebuild their neglected militaries.

        You might also remember that the division of Europe during the cold war was backed up by nuclear weapons. The fact that we were able to maintain a standoff throuhout that era without nuking oiurselves into oblivion actually offers a glimer of hope for humanity.

        The Warsaw Pact collapsed due to decades of bad management. Ronlad Reagan was only one factor in the outcome of the cold war.

        Reaching out, understanding, and forgiving are part and parcel of Christianity. There have been times when groups have tried to strip these traits out of the religion, and the results haven't been pretty.

        OTOH if you're going to create a Muslim holiday I think you'd better convene a meeting of the top clerics in your country and get their opinion of what would be appropriate. Muslims can get pretty touchy when non-muslims try to tell them what their religion is all about.
        "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

        Comment


        • #5
          Again, what a stupid writing. I can't believe it's written by European. First of all, the earlier 'appeasment' in the WWII.. what does he mean? EUROPE attacked EUROPE.. Nazis were Euros too. Again we choose one thing and make a conclusion from it and be biased about it.

          And yeah, I believe if Euro countries starts messing around again, it'll be in the crappers soon. We fight with the most stupid topics in here anyway. Bitter bickering about toodly tooties, whhich no one cares. With EU, it is possible and likely, but I don't think just yet.. it'll take some more time.. get things organized and beefed up a little.
          In da butt.
          "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
          THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
          "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

          Comment


          • #6
            But this time Europeans could be making right on past wrongs. The reason its such a mess in the ME is because of dictatorships the west propped up. Time to stop supporting the dictators. to Bush et al for at least taking out Saddam even if they are hypocritical about other dictatorships. I don't like Bush for a variety of reasons, but I can't criticise him for removing Saddam. I can only criticise him for removing Saddam before sending OBL and AQ off to their 72 virgins.

            Btw, I always thought it peculiar a religion would portray itself as the ultimate in morality when their heavenly reward is 72 virgins. I've heard of thinking with your dicck but is that where they found their souls too?

            Comment


            • #7
              Europe messing the ME

              Dubya cleaning Europe's mess time after time
              In da butt.
              "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
              THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
              "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

              Comment


              • #8
                If Europeans are appeasing anyone, it's Bush.
                Tecumseh's Village, Home of Fine Civilization Scenarios

                www.tecumseh.150m.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  OTOH if you're going to create a Muslim holiday I think you'd better convene a meeting of the top clerics in your country and get their opinion of what would be appropriate. Muslims can get pretty touchy when non-muslims try to tell them what their religion is all about.


                  Well if they put it on the day after Ramadan (Eid ul Fitr), then that would be appropriate. Of course, since it is based on a lunar calender, you don't really know what exact day it is until the month before .
                  “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                  - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Whether or not it was actually written by who it is acredited too, it is a typically hardline conservative rant. They insist in believing that they are locked in a struggle for their very survival, an epic battle between good and evil, where there can be no compromise, where there can be no negotiating. Ironically, the more they base their policy upon this world-view, the more true their worldview becomes.
                    However, the world that they would have us believe in is not a nice world. Why should we believe in it, and by believing in it, make it so? Rather, if instead of propogating violence with violence, we seek to address the conditions that make violence inevitable, we can live in a better world.
                    "Remember, there's good stuff in American culture, too. It's just that by "good stuff" we mean "attacking the French," and Germany's been doing that for ages now, so, well, where does that leave us?" - Elok

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Europe - Thy Name is Cowardice?

                      This text is pure crap. Here's why

                      Originally posted by pchang
                      A few days ago Henry Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe - your family name is appeasement." It's a phrase you can't get out of your head because it's so terribly true.

                      Appeasement cost millions of Jews and non-Jews their lives as England and France, allies at the time, negotiated and hesitated too long before they noticed that Hitler had to be fought, not bound to toothless agreements.

                      If anything, hitler's rise to power wasn't due to appeasement, but to the arrogance of the Versailles treaty. It's not appeasement that has costed the lives of millions, but the murderous tendencies of hitler. The war might have been won more quickly if Britain and France declared war sooner, but it's not like hitler was defenseless in 1938. And it's not like hitler wouldn't have started the holocaust.

                      Appeasement legitimized and stabilized Communism in the Soviet Union, then East Germany, then all the rest of Eastern Europe where for decades, inhuman, suppressive, murderous governments were glorified as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities.

                      I don't know for you, but given the choice between appeasement and a nuclear holocaust, I prefer appeasement. The Yanks and the Sovs seem to have the same idea, considering that we were united in our common fear of this possibility. Maybe that's the whole world that is a coward when there's this kind of stake, I don't know.

                      Appeasement crippled Europe when genocide ran rampant in Kosovo, and even though we had absolute proof of ongoing mass-murder, we Europeans debated and debated and debated, and were still debating when finally the Americans had to come from halfway around the world, into Europe yet again, and do our work for us.

                      The author conveniently ignores the fact that the Rambouillet bargainings, at the premature end of which NATO started the war, was depicted as the last diplomatic chance. The Yanks mode the war happen faster, but it's not like the idea was alien to us.

                      Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European appeasement, camouflaged behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now countenances suicide bombings in Israel by fundamentalist Palestinians.

                      I fail to see the relationship between Europe and fundamentalist Palestinians. If one really wanted to blame Europe for the current situation, one may blame the Brits for their handling of the situation 100-60 years ago, but that's about it. The Israel / Palestine conflict takes its specificity from the fact that it's almost entirely motivated by internal dynamics. There's some interference from the US and Arabic countries, but that's about it.

                      Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore nearly 500,000 victims of Saddam's torture and murder machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace-movement, has the gall to issue bad grades to George Bush...

                      Yeah, right, we didn't go after Saddam out of cowardice. We trembled in fear at the word "Saddam", wondering when he'll use his gigantic armies to invade us all.
                      Our countries' diplomacy's support was certainly cynical. But the reason why the people opposed the war was not because they were bribed. It was because they loathe war.

                      And now we are faced with a particularly grotesque form of appeasement... How is Germany reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere? By suggesting that we really should have a "Muslim Holiday" in Germany.

                      So, now we're arriving to what this paper is about. The boss of the company that produces the fiercely conservative tabloid Bild doesn't want to see old Christian Germany having an official holiday derived from a religion he dislikes.

                      I wish I were joking, but I am not. A substantial fraction of our (German) Government, and if the polls are to be believed, the German people, actually believe that creating an Official State "Muslim Holiday" will somehow spare us from the wrath of the fanatical Islamists.

                      One cannot help but recall Britain's Neville Chamberlain waving the laughable treaty signed by Adolf Hitler, and declaring European "Peace in our time".

                      1. I strongly doubt the debate looks nearly like that. More probably, the German government is thinking about ways to better integrate its Muslim population so that fewer of them sink in radical Islam.
                      2. So creating a Muslim Holiday is in the same style (I won't even say "the same importance") as giving up Czekoslowakia? Interesting.

                      What else has to happen before the European public and its political leadership get it? There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially perfidious crusade consisting of systematic attacks by fanatic Muslims, focused on civilians, directed against our free, open Western societies, and intent upon Western Civilization's utter destruction.

                      What else has to happen before conservative press moguls get it? Fanaticism is fueled by people, and we should make sure that as few people as possible should be lured by it - instead of blindingly continuing to alienate them.

                      It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than any of the great military conflicts of the last century - a conflict conducted by an enemy that cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures, which have proven to be, and will always be taken by the Islamists for signs of weakness.

                      ALERT ALERT - So we shouldn't show tolerance to Muslims as a whole, as it will only serve the fanatics. This statement either means that 1) moderate Muslims will remain so for the rest of their lives, while radical Muslims will remain so for the rest of their lives ; or 2) all Muslims are the enemy and they're encouraged by gestures of tolerance.

                      These Kulturkampf arguments draw on prejudices that are worrisome, don't you think?

                      Only two recent American Presidents had the courage needed for anti-appeasement: Reagan and Bush.

                      His American critics may quibble over the details, but we Europeans know the truth. We saw it first hand: Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War, freeing half of the German people from nearly 50 years of terror and virtual slavery. And Bush, supported only by the Social Democrat Blair, acting on moral conviction, recognized the danger in the Islamic War against democracy. His place in history will have to be evaluated after a number of years have passed.

                      Reagan didn't end the cold war any more than the Pope did. The USSR fell for internal reasons, mostly economic. Reagan's rethorics were mostly aimed at restoring the shattered American confidence. And Bush did recognize the danger in the Islamic War only after Sept. 11. Prior to that, he developed an isolationist platform.

                      In the meantime, Europe sits back with charismatic self-confidence in the multicultural corner, instead of defending liberal society's values and being an attractive center of power on the same playing field as the true great powers, America and China.

                      So let me get this straight: by creating a Muslim holiday, Germany is letting "liberal society's values" being trampled?

                      On the contrary - we Europeans present ourselves, in contrast to those "arrogant Americans", as the World Champions of "tolerance", which even (Germany's Interior Minister) Otto Schily justifiably criticizes. Why? Because we're so moral? I fear it's more because we're so materialistic, so devoid of a moral compass.

                      This is certainly true. We lack the zealotry of both the American government and Muslim fanatics.

                      For his policies, Bush risks the fall of the dollar, huge amounts of additional national debt, and a massive and persistent burden on the American economy - because unlike almost all of Europe, Bush realizes what is at stake - literally everything.

                      The fall of the dollar and the massive expanses have of course nothing to do with a demand-side economic policy A kind of policy that his conservative rag opposes when done in Germany, btw.

                      While we criticize the "capitalistic robber barons" of America because they seem too sure of their priorities, we timidly defend our Social Welfare systems. Stay out of it! It could get expensive! We'd rather discuss reducing our 35-hour workweek or our dental coverage, or our 4 weeks of paid vacation... Or listen to TV pastors preach about the need to "reach out to terrorists. To understand and forgive".

                      That's funny, because the Yanks have plenty of internal debates about domestic policies. The tax cuts were all the rage in recent past, and the suggested privatization of socisal security is the main topic these days.

                      These days, Europe reminds me of an old woman who, with shaking hands, frantically hides her last pieces of jewelry when she notices a robber breaking into a neighbor's house.

                      Appeasement? Europe, thy name is Cowardice.

                      Yeah, more emotional appeals. But nothing surprising from the guy who publishes the Bild
                      "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                      "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                      "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        This letter is a pathetic pile of crap.
                        In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Pchang: I don't know if it's a true Op-ed, but I see no reason to believe it is false. There are quite a few media people who parrot the American prejudices against Europe. They're not that many (I'd imagine the 80%-20% divide is roughly the same in the media than in other people), but they're quite vocal, considering they're alwys invited to express themselves when there is a need for an opposing point of view.
                          "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                          "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                          "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            He goes on and on ranting about how bad Muslims are. Yet he seems to like the Kosovo war (which was about protecting Muslims from Christians). He praises Clinton's America for it, yet he says that Bush and Reagan were the only recent anti-appeasers (He doesn't say which Bush, though). Confusion.
                            So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
                            Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              BLARG BLARG THE ONLY WAY TO BE A GOOD PATRIOTIC EUROPEAN IS TO PUT AMERICA'S INTERESTS AHEAD OF MY OWN COUNTRY'S.
                              "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
                              "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X