the WORST Empire building game youve ever played(Turn based or RTS)

[The Rusty Gamer]

I disagree about Deadlock & Deadlock 2. I really like them.

I've also had some enjoyable times with Fragile Allegiance. It had some blatant flaws which could've been easiy fixed but still some fun to be had.

[:) Smiley]

Star Wars Rebellion sucked if you tried to play the game well... which meant sabotaging the hell out of everything. It was fairly entertaining when you played stupid style, whiich would let the AI live past day 500 get you into big fleet battles that weren't one-sided.

[Arcainite]

worst RTS game I've played

Star Trek: New Worlds...

[Urban Ranger]

Birth of the Federation ::vomit::

[Nubclear]

Civ1 sucks compared to more modern empire games. Especially Civ2

[Adagio]

Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
Civ1 sucks compared to more modern empire games. Especially Civ2

I liked Civ1 more than Civ2...

[child of Thor]

but Civ3 is best.....no?

[DrSpike]

No.

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Sava
Superpower....
Civ3 (before PTW)

was superpower really that bad - concept sounded interesting.

[child of Thor]

Originally posted by DrSpike
No.

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by ADG


I liked Civ1 more than Civ2...

Civ1 is the prequel to Civ3.

Civ2 stands out all on its own.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by ADG
I liked Civ1 more than Civ2...

Same here.

Civ 2 just fine tuned a number of Civ characteristics.

[DrSpike]

I don't get it. Sure Civ1 was original, and made the breakthrough, but Civ2 in absolute terms is simply a better game. We can dispute for days whether it does enough for a sequel, but there is simply no way you can say Civ1 is a better game.

[FrustratedPoet]

there is simply no way you can say Civ1 is a better game.

They aren't ... not necessarily anyway.

Note how they say "I like Civ more than Civ2", instead of "I think Civ is a better game than Civ2".

They are plenty of old games that I liked more than their sequels, even though the sequels were simply better games. Even if a few improvements are made, some things just aren't so much fun the second or third time around.

[Adagio]

Originally posted by FrustratedPoet

there is simply no way you can say Civ1 is a better game.

They aren't ... not necessarily anyway.

Note how they say "I like Civ more than Civ2", instead of "I think Civ is a better game than Civ2".

They are plenty of old games that I liked more than their sequels, even though the sequels were simply better games. Even if a few improvements are made, some things just aren't so much fun the second or third time around.