Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Battle of Baghdad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    You don't move an entire armored division by plane. Such a division has hundreads of tanks and thousand of other vehicles, and it is all rather useless without mass quantities of ammunition and fuel.

    If they are moving the 1st armored form germany, it will take some time.
    If you don't like reality, change it! me
    "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
    "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
    "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

    Comment


    • #77
      You don't move an entire armored division by plane.


      No kidding. That's probably why Ned said this...

      Correction, they are airlifting, at least initially, a brigade of the 1st Infantry. It is mechanized.


      KH FOR OWNER!
      ASHER FOR CEO!!
      GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

      Comment


      • #78


        right back at yah!
        If you don't like reality, change it! me
        "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
        "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
        "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

        Comment


        • #79
          Of course, this new info brings up an important question. If the 1st Armored is in Germany and the 1st Infantry is out of country as well, what the hell is under the V Corps leadership in Iraq?
          KH FOR OWNER!
          ASHER FOR CEO!!
          GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
            A general on CNN said the C17 can carry M1's.


            Well, if the C17 can carry M1's then the C5 can too. I guess my information was wrong...
            Its really amazing when you think how the M1A1 weights 70 tons! Think about a plane which can generate that much lift force....damn...
            "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
            - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
            Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

            Comment


            • #81
              The 1,000 vehicle column was apparently decimated. Why would Iraq send its soldiers into the open field? Is this coherent?
              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

              Comment


              • #82
                So much good stuff, so little time.

                Drake: re "transportation difficulties" When a division gets deployment orders to a combat theater, you don't have transportation difficulties. Worst case is you relieve a bunch of loggies, promote some subordinate loggies, and move the ****ing show down the road. Worst case is a shortage of dock capacity and traffic issues out of KC, which is why clearing Umm Qasr's port facilities and getting Seabees and the RN equivalent in there will be nice.

                Dan, Ned, et al. Apparently nowhere's near 1000 vehicles, but weather is only an issue for CAS missions. If you have JSTARS and B-52's loitering for interdiction missions, wind and weather simply means the bastards hear absolutely nothing before the bombs impact.

                Re V Corps. 1 AD got its deployment orders out of Germany before 1 CD got orders to move out from Hood. If you look at the raw numbers of ground forces reported to be in theater, and the attachments to the identified divisions (all of the divisions are reinforced and/or "fat" from their standard TO&Es), there are a lot of forces claimed in theater that are not accounted for in the units mentioned in the news so far.

                Re air deployment of armored divisions, etc.

                Except for the light and airborne/airmobile divisions, the rest of the US divisions pretty much have the same TO&E - there's not much that distinguishes an infantry from a cav from an armored division, at the divisional level. How you break down and mix and match subordinate units, is different, as is the fighting and movement posture (does armor support the infantry, or infantry support the armor? ). From an airlift standpoint, it's about the same. A full scale divisional airlift can be made in around 1400 C5B sorties, which takes a while because there's not that many of them, they have traffic limits on airfields, and you have to figure in maintenance hours for the aircraft. With C17s, it's about 2300 sorties for the full division.

                As far as equipment goes, M1's are a pain in the ass - you can move one and a little extra stuff in a C17, or you can move two in a C5B with a little extra mid-air refueling, since two M1's are very close to the operational weight limit of the C5. M2's and M109's are lighter, but they take up a lot of space, so efficient loading and palletizing of supplies takes time, so you can reduce the total number of airlift sorties.

                If you have the airfield(s) that can take the aircraft at close to the maximum traffic levels, and if you don't have a lot of other demands on your air transport capacity, air deployment of the entire division plus a reasonable level of supplies can be accomplished in less than two weeks, but it's a real ***** of a job.

                Dan - no, it's not coherent, but that's the great generalship of the Saddamites for you. They've bought into this hooey about how they're kicking our asses, they've managed a group self-delusion about the last war, at least at the top command levels, and they give in to the natural reflex of most armies to try to strike back. Nobody likes to be under siege, nobody likes to be on the strategic, operational and tactical defensive, and handling an army under those conditions requires extraordinary discipline, not only of the troops, but of the tendency of the troops and the leaders to want to get in a few blows and take at least part of the fight to the enemy. The Ardennes offensive didn't make any sense, either.
                When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                Comment


                • #83
                  Agreed about the JSTARs and the B52's, but weren't F15's also participating in close air support? They're capabable in an all-weather role, plus can target distinct targets independently. Not sure if crosswinds in the southern bases would have grounded them, though.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    They've bought into this hooey about how they're kicking our asses, they've managed a group self-delusion about the last war, at least at the top command levels, and they give in to the natural reflex of most armies to try to strike back.


                    Which I predicted a few days ago, BTW...
                    KH FOR OWNER!
                    ASHER FOR CEO!!
                    GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Here's an interesting article about urban warfare.

                      Now, as the main battle in Iraq moves toward a conclusion near or in Baghdad, the specter that concerned Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and his gene


                      Don't know what to make of it. I hope our boys have done their homework and the Iraqis haven't. Perhaps the Pentagon is trying to lull the Iraqis into a false timeline.



                      But the Iraqis are talking tough.

                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        They talked tough even at the cease fire last time, on D+4

                        Then they **** their pants when the subject of POW exchange came up, and we said we had over 80,000.

                        There is an analogy to be made to Hitler here, although those are usually groaners, no matter who you apply them to, but in this case, it's really the closest one.

                        A couple of cool Hitler stories are really illustrative of the Iraqi senior command mindset. In the first one, during the early planning for Operation Barbarossa, the army high command told Hitler that 20 panzer divisions would be needed to invade Russia. At the time, the Germans had 10. Addi's solution? Easy, just take half the armor establishment from each of the first ten, add some infantry and other stuff, and you've got your 20. Never mind that you have the same number of tanks overall, and the same number of infantry and other stuff, you've just shoved things around and made smaller units. You've got your 20 panzer divisions, so problem solved.

                        Late in the war, in the southern portion of the western front (around Metz, IIRC), Hitler was micromanaging unit placements, and he and his sycophants in Wolfsschanze assigned a then-typical frontage of seven miles to a particular infantry division. Never mind readiness and casualty reports that had been ever so dutifully reported and recorded all the way up the line. Never mind that this "division" consisted of 14 self-propelled guns and four infantry "battalions" of about 80 men each. The "division" was less than true battalion strength, but it was called a division, so it would be deployed as a division.

                        The same type of self-delusion permeates the Iraqi command. Pessimistic assessments, or reports of failure get you shot, so the senior commanders learn to talk tough and massage the numbers and reports. Then they have to act out the roles, as if all the BS was true.

                        Saddam's lackeys will be portraying themselves as beating our asses right up until the very end.
                        When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          MtG, Well one learns something new every day. I had never known before that the German high command knew they didn't have enough armor to successfully invade Russia.
                          http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            i predict a mini-stalingard
                            Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. -Homer

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Well, looks like the battle is imminent. FT puts the opening stages within the next 48 hours...

                              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                CNN's current report on the situation is a bit dodgy. First, they report on the Marines (without specifying unit, but it's all 1 MEF as a Corps level unit) engaging IRG Medina in the vicinity of Karbala, and say they're next going to engage IRG Baghdad (which is composited IRG Al Nida plus IRG Baghdad) around al Kut.

                                This makes no sense in a couple of respects - the western part of 3 ID's position is facing Karbala, so how to the Marines get there, and how do the Marines reposition forces to al Kut, which is quite far south and over 100 miles from Karbala?

                                Hopefully, from other sources and/or in the next day or so, we'll have a real picture of what's going on.
                                When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X