Tweet
FARC solution: Plausable or just too E X C I T I N G?!?!
Seeing as how I go into this knowing absolutely nothing of the size of terrain or populace under reign of our beloved car bombing, pig f*cking, coke running, Godless Che wannabe terrorists - you'll have to add practical clips to an abstract "battle" campaign I am about to lend you (and one that seems just all too easy!)
Now - to this point I know that FARC are a terrrorist group operating on some 300 hectorometres of cubic Tundra in the (maybe British)Columbian jungle stuff and waterfall lands. They have strong ties with Columbian druglords (as do few corrupt Columbian beauracrats & generals), yet as I now believe - FARC's ties are vast and near (if not) official - Correct? Whatever their glorious cause for communist revolution and the ensuing free land to brew truckloads of near toxic ethyl beverages from rotting carrots, it's more or less established that their methods are rather harsh and unorthodox - correct? It should be obvious even for militants who grew up in a dank jungle learning to brush any poisonous spiders off of the potonga leaf before wiping their ass instead of learning, oh say - basic arithmetic and how to function and influence change in a much more stable society... that blowing up innocent civilians is in any case, probably wrong!
(Here's where I have to throw a few of you broken records a bone, as THE USA HAS HAD ITS FAIR SHARE OF KILLING INNOCENT CIVILLIANS, yet there are plenty of threads to debate their punishment for such actions - for now we're dealing with a directionless organization which has so far NOT produced a coherent plan for society and multitude of pros to more than dwarf its ethical cons. Please take any deadlocked UsAS IS EVILERER THEN MY GOOD COMMIE GUYS thoughts to a relevant thread, thanks.)
So in all seriousness, I do not understand this. Why, if the US of America is doing such a good job in the initial stages of raping world evil, has a simple and obvious solution to the "FARC" cancer not yet been used? Get this:
-With acceptance of Columbia, the US lends military aid to erradicate FARC forces with a harsh and swift surprise air campaign!!!
-However many c-130s are realistically available for the (week long?) operation are loaded with daisy cutters and sent swarming the territory, dropping the 15, 000 pound goodies on any educated location of significant use, or any infrared blob that represents more than 5 people.
-With several thousand small mushroom clouds going up around you over several dozen horrific and sleepless hours, would you not disperse in a panic amongst the random and seemingly camouflaged jungle? This is where it gets good!
-B-52 bombers are quite possibly man's greatest creation, and I dare say one of the most beautiful vehicles ever concieved. What better than to now fly these suckers wingtip to wingtip out of home base and litter every square inch of this hostile land with cluster bombs? Now that the majority of the rebels are under a moss covered log in a pile of feces - these little devils are the perfect device to finish the job.
-After a few runs of the above, and once the fires subside, thousands of Columbian troops rush the remains to round up any prisoners, and take pictures of the remaining results (so people like skyjack 666 can post them here)
Now the problems:
-Civilians dotting the area might make this a little tricky!
-I'm sure the rebels must have dirty concubine baby factories, and babies are known to explode when subjected to bombing
-Can a C-130 even fly there and back from Texas? If not, I'm not one to gauge what's needed!
Do you support a basic plan of the like - why or why not?
Would it work - why or why not?
Now - to this point I know that FARC are a terrrorist group operating on some 300 hectorometres of cubic Tundra in the (maybe British)Columbian jungle stuff and waterfall lands. They have strong ties with Columbian druglords (as do few corrupt Columbian beauracrats & generals), yet as I now believe - FARC's ties are vast and near (if not) official - Correct? Whatever their glorious cause for communist revolution and the ensuing free land to brew truckloads of near toxic ethyl beverages from rotting carrots, it's more or less established that their methods are rather harsh and unorthodox - correct? It should be obvious even for militants who grew up in a dank jungle learning to brush any poisonous spiders off of the potonga leaf before wiping their ass instead of learning, oh say - basic arithmetic and how to function and influence change in a much more stable society... that blowing up innocent civilians is in any case, probably wrong!
(Here's where I have to throw a few of you broken records a bone, as THE USA HAS HAD ITS FAIR SHARE OF KILLING INNOCENT CIVILLIANS, yet there are plenty of threads to debate their punishment for such actions - for now we're dealing with a directionless organization which has so far NOT produced a coherent plan for society and multitude of pros to more than dwarf its ethical cons. Please take any deadlocked UsAS IS EVILERER THEN MY GOOD COMMIE GUYS thoughts to a relevant thread, thanks.)
So in all seriousness, I do not understand this. Why, if the US of America is doing such a good job in the initial stages of raping world evil, has a simple and obvious solution to the "FARC" cancer not yet been used? Get this:
-With acceptance of Columbia, the US lends military aid to erradicate FARC forces with a harsh and swift surprise air campaign!!!
-However many c-130s are realistically available for the (week long?) operation are loaded with daisy cutters and sent swarming the territory, dropping the 15, 000 pound goodies on any educated location of significant use, or any infrared blob that represents more than 5 people.
-With several thousand small mushroom clouds going up around you over several dozen horrific and sleepless hours, would you not disperse in a panic amongst the random and seemingly camouflaged jungle? This is where it gets good!
-B-52 bombers are quite possibly man's greatest creation, and I dare say one of the most beautiful vehicles ever concieved. What better than to now fly these suckers wingtip to wingtip out of home base and litter every square inch of this hostile land with cluster bombs? Now that the majority of the rebels are under a moss covered log in a pile of feces - these little devils are the perfect device to finish the job.
-After a few runs of the above, and once the fires subside, thousands of Columbian troops rush the remains to round up any prisoners, and take pictures of the remaining results (so people like skyjack 666 can post them here)
Now the problems:
-Civilians dotting the area might make this a little tricky!
-I'm sure the rebels must have dirty concubine baby factories, and babies are known to explode when subjected to bombing
-Can a C-130 even fly there and back from Texas? If not, I'm not one to gauge what's needed!
Do you support a basic plan of the like - why or why not?
Would it work - why or why not?
They would be in control if it wasn't for the CIA tring to subvert them, using the anti-drug excuse to go in, to keep Columbia in control of rightists and corporations.
Comment