What is the World Prepared to Do to Contain American Aggression?

[chequita guevara]

Democratic governments that support US aggression do so at their own peril, especially if the war goes badly (however that is defined). Blair is putting his head on the chopping block. Chirac, a Conservative, is leading the oppostion in Europe. How many governments will be voted out for their support of US war-mongering?

Ninty percent of the population of the world is opposed to the U.S. aggression against Iraq (Osama bin Laden has succeeded in at least one of his goals). Most countries are opposed, with the exception of Israel and Kuwait, the majority populations in every other country are opposed to war without UN approval (including the United States).

What is the world prepared to do to stop us? War is out of the question (except in North Korea, which is completely out of touch with reality). What about sanctions? What if the opposed governments of the world threatened to impose sanctions against the US if the US attacked without UN approval? Maybe Europe could throw us out of NATO (it would never happen).

The world has a duty to stop the United States. While I don't wish war upon any people, especially my own, there are other methods of forcing our Hitler from invading Czechoslavakia.

Stand up to us, damnit! Stop us before we kill again.

[DuncanK]

Che, sanctions are even less likely and at least have as severe of concequences. It's up to Americans, and it is probably too late

[Dinner]

"What is the World Prepared to Do to Contain American Aggression? "

It appears they're prepared to allow school kids to march in the street, smoke pot, and wave sings with oh so witty slogons. That most of the slogon are no sense doesn't really matter to them just like solve real problems doesn't really matter to them.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by DuncanK
It's up to Americans, and it is probably too late

We've never stopped a war before it happened, although we did stop the February bombings of Iraq (forget the year). Furthermore, short of a massive disruption in the US, i.e., strikes, the government isn't prepared to listen to us anyway. They know that once the bombs start falling, most of the American public will fall in line and support the troops. Remember, if this President cared about the democratic will of the American people, he wouldn't be President.

It's up to the world to stop Hitler before he annexes Czechoslovakia. We Germans don't have the ability to stop him.

[orange]

Che - I had the exact same thought today. What if we expand war against Iraq and possibly North Korea to war against Iran Libya Syria, etc. etc. Is the world prepared to do something about it?

In the future will I be hailing France and England as my liberators from this land of lost hope?

[Ted Striker]

[orange]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
It's up to the world to stop Hitler before he annexes Czechoslovakia. We Germans don't have the ability to stop him.

Who was our Austria?

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by orange
Who was our Austria?

Kosovo?

[Ted Striker]

Texas

[Shi Huangdi]

AMERIKA UBER ALLES!

[orange]

I bet the German people rolled their eyes too

[David Floyd]

The world can't do much in the way of sanctions, without wrecking their own economies. Taking the US out of the global marketplace is ridiculously unrealistic. It's even more unrealistic to expect to challenge the US militarily (even against the rest of the world, the US would come out ahead).

Unfortunately, the only people who can stop this war are Americans. Hopefully we'll do our part by voting Bush out of office, and voting for a Libertarian or even a Green in 2004.

Which brings me to the next point. Seeing as how the Libertarian Party is the largest Third Party in the US, would Independents, Greens, Socialists, and Communists be willing to vote Libertarian in the 2004 elections, in order to secure the largest possible opposition to the main parties? If the LP gets 5% or even 10% of the vote in a national election, we'll finally start seeing anti-war, pro-freedom candidates in the debates, and possibly even start electing these people to Congress.

So, third party people, what do you say? Vote Libertarian as the best method to oppose the Republicrats!

[orange]

wow...i'm shocked that you would prefer a Green party candidate...

but maybe you're onto something. We need someone to run for the 3rd party party, and all the 3rd parties can vote for him. Then we can get him to outlaw Republicans and Democrats, and have a fair election for everyone BUT

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by David Floyd
Seeing as how the Libertarian Party is the largest Third Party in the US

But the Greens get more votes. Why don't you support Ralph Nader?

[Boris Godunov]

I think a lot of the warmongering is due to sexual frustration.

So, in the spirit of self-sacrifice, I will go down on as many men as it takes to stop American aggression!*








*--Offer may not apply to smellies, oldies, fatties and/or baldies.