Tweet
I would not apologise for something I had no part in, I would just express regret. Similarly I think that an expression of regret from the PM could be made, an apology is not really appropriate.
-
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry. -
They would, because of all the lies and propaganda the government fed them for years. In 1940, they wouldn't have felt that way, yet once the government got ahold of them and brainwashed them, they suddenly changed their minds. ****ing governmentAt that time, WWII vets put up quite a protest.
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
Remember Pearl Harbor. Payback's a *****.Originally posted by David Floyd
They would, because of all the lies and propaganda the government fed them for years. In 1940, they wouldn't have felt that way, yet once the government got ahold of them and brainwashed them, they suddenly changed their minds. ****ing government
Comment
-
Pearl Harbor wouldn't have happened if the US hadn't acted like an aggressive sonofa***** in 1846 and 1898 (and in taking over Hawaii), or if they hadn't restricted free trade with Japan.Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
Ludicrous.Comment
-
Actually it's true. If we hadn't been in the Pacific as a result of our aggressive wars in the 19th Century, Japan couldn't possibly have attacked PacFlt at Pearl Harbor. Think about it.Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
Did the Japanese invade Viet Nam and China because of past wrongs, Mitty?
They were bullies. They would have taken their shot regardless. It was a power play, Floyd. Didn't matter what we did in the 1800's. "There could be only one!"Comment
-
Saying that Pearl Harbor wouldn't have happened if we didn't own Pearl Harbor isn't exactly brilliant insight.
-Arriangrog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!
The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.Comment
-
Look, genius, it's simple logic. The US had bases in the Pacific because of US aggression. If you take away the aggression, you take away the bases. If you take away the bases, Japan can't attack them. Remember, the US wouldn't be on the West Coast either, so I'm not sure where you think Japan would have attacked, or why.They were bullies. They would have taken their shot regardless. It was a power play, Floyd. Didn't matter what we did in the 1800's. "There could be only one!"Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
This is silly. The Japanese didn't attack them to right a wrong. But to defeat a rival. They didn't attack Vietnam to right a wrong either. But because it was something to pick on.Originally posted by David Floyd
Look, genius, it's simple logic. The US had bases in the Pacific because of US aggression. If you take away the aggression, you take away the bases. If you take away the bases, Japan can't attack them. Remember, the US wouldn't be on the West Coast either, so I'm not sure where you think Japan would have attacked, or why.Comment
-
Fine, but you are missing the point. If we hadn't acted immorally originally, Japan could not have acted immorally against us.
Besides which, it was wrong for the government to restrict free trade with Japan.Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
Oh, and in any case, it does not speak very highly of the personal morality of many people when they support and defend the atomic bombing of civilians as revenge for an attack on a purely military target that only killed a few thousand people.Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
Why are we required to to trade with Japan?Originally posted by David Floyd
Besides which, it was wrong for the government to restrict free trade with Japan.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
We aren't. But the US government has a moral obligation not to infringe upon the freedom of Americans (including American businesses) to trade with whomever they want.Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/Comment
-
You still haven't explained how that constitutes valid cause for war.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
Comment