Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

North Or South Korea: Which is Worse?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • North Or South Korea: Which is Worse?



    U.S. Troops in South Korea Encounter Increased Hostility
    By JAMES BROOKE


    EOUL, South Korea, Jan. 8 — Lt. Col. Steven Boylan's combat patch comes from flying helicopters in El Salvador, but his parents think his Purple Heart should come from walking the streets of Seoul.

    That became clear one night last month when three Korean men cornered him in a tunnel on his way home. "They started cussing me in English, `G.I. get out, G.I. go home,' " the colonel, a 41-year-old Wisconsin native, recalled today. "They attacked me, and I made a defensive maneuver. It was only when I made it back to post that I saw I had been stabbed."

    The world worries about whether North Korea is making nuclear weapons. Television correspondents do live stand-ups from the demilitarized zone, the "last cold war frontier." But to hear some G.I.'s tell it, the highest risk of violence is on the streets of South Korean cities, where political leaders have allowed anti-Americanism to run unchecked.

    "They are being spat on," Colonel Boylan said. "They are being cussed at. They are being hit."

    He has become a one-man clearinghouse for abuse reports, partly because of his stabbing and partly because of his high-profile job as the Eighth Army's public affairs officer.

    "People are not allowed entry into restaurants," he said. "A soldier coming to work had some guys jump out of their car and start beating on her car."

    Most of the G.I.'s interviewed here could recount several troubling incidents, but many also said they generally felt quite safe.

    "My daughter who is 16 can go out at night with her girlfriends by subway without any problems," said Lt. Col. Francis J. Smith Jr., 50, a Special Forces officer. "She can't do that back home in Philadelphia."

    Nevertheless, driving out of Eighth Army headquarters here, soldiers today checked a new "conditions" sign. For each of the eight major American bases here, two kinds of conditions are updated regularly: "road conditions" and "demonstrations." Another sign urged Americans — soldiers and civilians — to go out in pairs, reminding them, "The buddy system is in effect."

    The rising anti-Americanism stems partly from the friction of having 37,000 United States troops living in close quarters with the people of one of the world's most densely populated countries. It was fanned in the presidential election last month, and before that by the trial and acquittal of two American servicemen who ran over and killed two Korean girls with their armored vehicle.

    But it is also unmistakably part of a generational shift of attitudes, a belief especially potent among South Korea's young that the country can manage its own affairs, and do it better than its longtime protector has lately. It is a resentment that at times, American servicemen and women say, verges on hatred.

    "My friends American, Canadian, British, New Zealander and Australian have all been affected," Sally Milne, a British teacher in Seoul, wrote in a letter printed today in The Korea Herald. "They have been glared at, spat on, refused seats on the subway and refused service in some stores."

    The recent explosion of anti-Americanism has been fueled as well by a general ignorance of why American soldiers are here. Many young South Koreans sincerely believe what North Korea has taught for decades: that American troops arrived here in 1950 and split the nation in two.

    In reality, the Communist North attacked first and almost wiped out South Korea. The historical fact that without American soldiers fighting under the United Nations flag there would be no South Korea today is often lost. "This is not an imperial occupation army," Colonel Smith said after his fast-food lunch at the "food house" at Eighth Army headquarters. "They ask us to go home, and we go home."

    The leaders of South Korea know this, and they send their representatives to international hotels here to tell American reporters soothingly how much they value the American military presence, which costs American taxpayers about $3 billion a year.

    American troops, they say, not only reassure foreign investors, but also serve as a human tripwire to draw the United States back in if troops from the North should ever cross the border. But before Korean audiences, Korean politicians shy away from defending or explaining the presence of American soldiers.

    With the harassment of American soldiers fostering a fledgling "Boycott Korea" movement in the United States, some people here speculate that the day will come when panicked South Koreans will punch 911 on their ubiquitous cellphones and the only American military response will come from the air.

    "I am concerned about the short political fuse in the United States," said Hyun Hong Choo, a lawyer who once served as ambassador to Washington. "If the talk becomes serious, then we will see some negative reaction from the international business community."

    Tami Overby of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea warned, "If there were serious consideration of troop withdrawals we would see investors seriously reconsidering their plans here."

    But reductions could be on the horizon. "I expect troop reductions," said Scott Snyder, Korea representative of The Asia Foundation, a regional research organization. "You could cut down to 20,000. You could consolidate bases. They are also hostage to protesters from liberal universities in Korea, which means every city in Korea."

    In one step to reduce friction, the United States forces in Korea agreed last fall to a 10-year plan to cut the amount of land occupied by American troops in half, to 50 square miles, and to reduce the number of bases almost in half, to 23.

    To Americans interviewed at the fast-food court on a base here, assessments of their relations with Koreans ranged from pleasant to frustrating. Sgt. Duane Stubbs said his teenage daughters had come here for Christmas, "and it widened their horizons better than any education."

    "They walked downtown without any problems," he added.

    "But I was in a clothing store with a buddy and they asked us if we were American servicemen," continued Sergeant Stubbs, a native of Cleveland. "We just left." But he added that as an African-American man growing up in the United States, he long ago learned to assess his surroundings judiciously.

    Jamie Murray, 32, a civilian employee at the base, said, "I guess they are all grown up and think maybe they don't need big brother around anymore."

    "A buddy of mine said this place could become another Philippines," he said, recalling the protest movements that led to the closing of American air and naval bases there.

    Pvt. Nicholas C. Kreiner, a 21-year-old from Michigan, said, "At times it is kind of frustrating. I am married, here without my wife, and then the Koreans don't want me here."

    Private Kreiner says the South Koreans were not shy about making their feelings known. "They threw eggs, candles over the fence, rocks against the guard tower," said the private, a military policeman. "In the street you hear, `Go home, G.I.! Yankee go home!' "

    To Colonel Boylan, the deepest cut of all came from two Korean children. "I was going to a function in dress uniform when I came across two kids, about 8 or 10 years old," he recalled. "They were laughing, smiling. Then they saw me. They stopped in their tracks and glared at me. Then they cussed at me — in English."

    As for the knife attack, his self-defense training spared him a deep wound to the gut that would have required stitches. "I am lucky to be alive," he said. "But I had to tell my mom: `There is no Purple Heart in it. We are not at war with the people of South Korea.' "
    I wonder when they'll issue an apology.
    Last edited by Ming; January 8, 2003, 16:42.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

  • #2
    The South Korean people who are doing this are acting like a bunch of infantile barbarians. Our troops are there at the will of their own government to protect them and this is how they treat our troops.
    Last edited by Shi Huangdi; January 8, 2003, 16:19.
    "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

    "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

    Comment


    • #3
      The South Korean people who are doing this are acting like a bunch of infantile barbarians. Our troops are there at the will of their own government to protect us and this is how they treat our troops.


      oh, and now, North Korea is much worse. Definetly.
      urgh.NSFW

      Comment


      • #4
        It appears there are two sides to every story, doesn't it?

        Like I said a while back: it is clear they don't want our troops there. I say pull 'em out.

        -Arrian
        grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

        The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

        Comment


        • #5
          Mis-statement. should be to protect them.
          "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

          "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

          Comment


          • #6
            I wonder when they'll issue an apology
            They'll go the Chinese route and demand an apology from Boylan and say that it is his fault because he didn't avoid the knife.
            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

            Comment


            • #7
              "They threw eggs, candles over the fence


              Oh. My. God.
              It's the apocalypse!
              Run for your lives everybody! The evil South Koreans are coming ... they've got candles and everything.

              And eggs too ... don't forget the eggs!!!

              And if they get really worked up they might even tell us to go home. My years of military training haven't equipped me for this.



              "A buddy of mine said this place could become another Philippines,"


              A buddy of mine thinks that people are living on Mars, this guy who lives down the road thinks that clowns are in league with Satan and next-door's cat says the rap music makes people commit murder.
              If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.

              Comment


              • #8
                You're no fun.
                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                "Capitalism ho!"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Didn't that article used to have adverts in it, which a couple of people made posts about? Only now both the adverts and the posts commenting on them are gone?

                  Or have I just gone mental?

                  I could have sworn I just saw them there .... I blame the ****ing Korens, the thought of those candle's had me so freaked out I went temporarily insane.


                  edit:
                  /me sees that Ming is responsible for that.
                  /me is glad he isn't mental.
                  If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    as a service member who is currently in south korea, i'll say (and you can feel free to take my word for it) that it's not as bad as this article makes it out to be.

                    Sure, there is a loud, vocal minority that wants US troops to leave, but the majority does not want us to leave. A larger minority wants changes to the SOFA (status of forces agreement), but not a total withdrawl of US troops.

                    Instances of violence are rare, very rare. The bulk of the demonstrations are peaceful, although they are more frequent recently than they historically have been.

                    As far as the US pulling out of south korea, i say BAD idea, for a couple of reasons.

                    1) perhaps the most important point is, if there were no US presence in south korea, north korea would attack. almost immediatly. and they would win.

                    2) because of number one (actually, simply the fact that number 1 MIGHT happen), a withdrawl of US presence would mean a withdraw of foreign investments in south korean buisnesses. Even if north korea didn't attack, the fact that they might would discourage investors, and lead to south koreas economy crashing.

                    and i'm sure there are more, but those are the two biggest reason, IMO
                    -connorkimbro
                    "We're losing the war on AIDS. And drugs. And poverty. And terror. But we sure took it to those Nazis. Man, those were the days."

                    -theonion.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      1) perhaps the most important point is, if there were no US presence in south korea, north korea would attack. almost immediatly. and they would win.
                      Forgive my ignorance, but why are you so convinced of this? Both parts: NK attacking and SK losing?

                      First off, all we have are 37,000 troops. Isn't that just a drop in the bucket compared to the numbers NK and SK would field in a war? So how is that the difference between victory and defeat?

                      -Arrian
                      grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                      The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Arrian

                        First off, all we have are 37,000 troops. Isn't that just a drop in the bucket compared to the numbers NK and SK would field in a war? So how is that the difference between victory and defeat?
                        Perhaps because as long as the US is there then an attack from the North wouldn't just be declaring war on South Korea, it would be declaring war on the US too.
                        If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I'll take the second part first,

                          37,000 is all we have here at the moment, but if war were to break out, the number of us troops would go up, probably to around 150,000 or so.

                          Second, it's not just the number of soldiers that matter, but the superiority of US military equipment, both in numbers, and superior technology.

                          Third, our economy can support a war better than theirs can, alone.

                          Fourth our intelligence (by that, i mean the quality and amount of our military intelligence) is better. Sure, we share alot of intelliegence with south korea, but there is a great deal we don't. Why not? I don't know, but we don't.

                          As for why they would attack. . . both south korea, and north korea want to unify. The difference is, south korea wants to unify peacefully, and stay democratic and capitalist (for obvious reasons) while the north wants to unify in any way possible. (read: through military conquest) Kim Jung Il of course wants to maintain power, so unifying, in his mind, would mean unifying under HIS leadership.

                          They only reason they do NOT attack, yet, is because of US presence. They want to avoid outright war with the US, unless they feel they have no other choice.

                          which is why bush's foreign policy scares me a bit, because i feel (my opinion) that he is dangerously close to making them feel as if they have no other choice.
                          -connorkimbro
                          "We're losing the war on AIDS. And drugs. And poverty. And terror. But we sure took it to those Nazis. Man, those were the days."

                          -theonion.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Both FP and Connorkimbro,

                            You guys are talking about the "tripwire" reason: that the 37K US troops are there to state loud and clear that if NK gets frisky, the US will back SK fully.

                            Why, if our troops weren't stationed there (pulled back to Japan or even the mainland US) couldn't we still back them up in the advent of war?

                            Is it a logistical thing? Would not having operational bases screw up our attempts at getting troops in? That I can understand.

                            As for the idea that NK would attack the moment we withdraw... I'm not so convinced. Kim Il whateverhisname must know that such a blatant attack would result in a response from the US, with most likely a large UN-sanctioned coalition. He may be a bastard, but do you really think he's THAT dumb?

                            -Arrian
                            grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                            The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
                              The South Korean people who are doing this are acting like a bunch of infantile barbarians. Our troops are there at the will of their own government to protect them and this is how they treat our troops.
                              Shi. are you serious? And I suppose the enlightened white men must stay in South Korea to take care of these infantile barbarians who obviously don´t know what´s in their own best interest? Man, it´s like hearing Cecil Rodhes speaking... The colonzation of Africa ended 50 years ago, but in Asia it´s still going strong.

                              But to answer the question I choose South over North. It´s a close call but In the South people aren´t starving to death at least (not that I know of anyway). Also, in the South they haven´t made a mockery out of socialism and they have free worker association and stuff.
                              I love being beaten by women - Lorizael

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X