Further, death isn't a good way of teaching someone they did wrong. Dead men don't learn...they're just dead.
If they judged the kid's actions to be a great threat to the public or to themselves, they have every right to open fire on him IMO, as long as they don't shoot to kill (although it's a very likely possibility).
All of this talk about other ways to deal with dangerous situations like taserguns and everything leaves me confused and wondering what that has to do with this case. I don't think every cop has access to that kind of stuff, and my instincts tell me the cops pulled the trigger when the kid did something threatening such as pointing a gun at the cops.
Comment