Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whats the difference between creation and evolution?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Saint Marcus
    so I already won. You can't answer even my first question.
    May I send the question right back to you? Because I doubt you know the answer either.

    Look, there is no god. Reason: I am going with my gut feeling on that.
    For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

    Comment


    • #32
      Look, there is no god. Reason: I am going with my gut feeling on that.
      that's no argument.

      And since there is no way you can prove a single word you say I go with the benefit of the doubt, that there is no god.
      benefit of the doubt? then you ought to give God a chance, right? so why don't you? why isn't there a God, other than "your gut feeling"?
      Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

      Comment


      • #33
        Only Creationists who believe one must interpret the Bible literally have a problem with evolution, because it runs contrary to the Biblical account
        and don't forget to mention how stories like the paradise would be.. a&e like some prehistoric creatures..

        so god is behind the evolution process.. but a quite big diversity of species are erradicated since evolution turned them into something hilarious..

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Saint Marcus
          benefit of the doubt? then you ought to give God a chance, right? so why don't you? why isn't there a God, other than "your gut feeling"?
          There isn't a god because it doesn't make sense for there to be one. I am an atheist and will not be moved by a monotheist.

          Why the heck should I believe in something that doesn't make any sense or can't even be proven? The existence of god doesn't have any evidence. You may say to disprove god doesn't have any evidence either but I'd rather go with what I think on this.
          For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

          Comment


          • #35
            There isn't a god because it doesn't make sense for there to be one.
            why not?

            btw, that's no argument, that's a statement. Please tell me why it makes no sense for there to be a God.

            I am an atheist and will not be moved by a monotheist.
            I'm an agnost, Fez.
            Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

            Comment


            • #36
              Why the heck should I believe in something that doesn't make any sense or can't even be proven? The existence of god doesn't have any evidence. You may say to disprove god doesn't have any evidence either but I'd rather go with what I think on this.
              you can't disprove God either. You can only make arguments for, and against, the existance of one. Now please make an argument AGAINST the existance of God.
              Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Saint Marcus


                why not?

                btw, that's no argument, that's a statement. Please tell me why it makes no sense for there to be a God.
                All I will say is it doesn't make sense for there to be one. Why should there be? god is something humans made up to make themselves not be afraid of death.

                I'm an agnost, Fez.
                And I am an atheist existentialist.
                For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Saint Marcus
                  ow please make an argument AGAINST the existance of God.
                  My argument: Why the hell should there be one? Disprove that.
                  For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    All I will say is it doesn't make sense for there to be one.
                    statement, no argument.

                    Why should there be?
                    counter-question, no argument.

                    god is something humans made up to make themselves not be afraid of death.
                    God and afterlife have nothing to do with eachother. Budhist believe in an afterlife (in the form of another life on earth), but don't believe in a God. (many) Jews don't believe in an afterlife, but do believe in a God. A life after death, and the existance of a God, don't always have something to do with eachother.

                    And I am an atheist existentialist.
                    oh really? and I assume you've read the works of Sartre then?
                    Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      My argument: Why the hell should there be one? Disprove that.
                      that's no argument. If it is, I can counter it by saying: "Why the hell shouldn't there be one? Disprove that".
                      Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Saint Marcus
                        God and afterlife have nothing to do with eachother. Budhist believe in an afterlife (in the form of another life on earth), but don't believe in a God. (many) Jews don't believe in an afterlife, but do believe in a God. A life after death, and the existance of a God, don't always have something to do with eachother.
                        Well pal I don't believe in god. Is there too much more you should know about that/

                        oh really? and I assume you've read the works of Sartre then?
                        No I have not. But the works of Camus, yes I have.

                        Would you stop trying to strike at something as gray as this? You say I should provide arguments when you cannot even provide anything yourself.
                        For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Fez : are you a functionalist as well as an atheist existentialist ?

                          Saint Marcus : could you please explain me precisely what the difference between agnost and atheist is ? I never knew it in detail...
                          "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                          "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                          "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            No I am not.

                            From what I know:

                            Atheist - Belief in no god
                            Agnostic - Not sure
                            For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Well pal I don't believe in god. Is there too much more you should know about that
                              yes. what are your arguments for it?

                              No I have not.
                              someone calling himself an existentialist, but hasn't read Sartre.

                              But the works of Camus, yes I have.
                              Really. Interesting. Not the most distinguised or difficult philosopher, but it's something. Can you tell me what they are about, in your view.

                              And I assume you agree with him, calling yourself an existentialist and all. I'm sure you know that Camus was part of the Parisian avant garde leftists for a while, don't you?

                              You say I should provide arguments when you cannot even provide anything yourself.
                              Nor can you. But I have an excuse. I'm an agnost, I admit I'm not sure. Yet you claim to be an atheist, but have absolutely no arguments at all why you are one. that's pretty funny.

                              Fez : are you a functionalist as well as an atheist existentialist ?
                              I think he's neither. He's just atheist.

                              Saint Marcus : could you please explain me precisely what the difference between agnost and atheist is ? I never knew it in detail...
                              An atheist rejects that God(s) exists. He believes there is no God. An agnost is just not sure.
                              Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                The theory of evolution describes a progress: it makes no statements as to the starting point of the process, nor the ending of it either. As long as you believe that the process evolution describes does occur, and has occured in the past, and will in the future, you are an evolutionist.

                                Belief in God is unscientific, in the sense that it is impossible, thorugh the scientific method, to come up with any sort of evidence for or against (by these of course we mean experimental or tangible eivdence. Rationalistic arguments aside).

                                Since beliefe in God is based on faith, it is quite possible to believe in God and the process of evolution.
                                Personally, I do not believe in God (as pictured in the monotheistic sense, as a single sentient entity), since for me, this is moving the basic question of origins one step back (why can't the universe come out of nothing, but that's fine for God?)
                                BUt at the same time, I can offer no evidence against the belief in God, so que sera, sera.
                                If you don't like reality, change it! me
                                "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
                                "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
                                "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X