Racial controversy

[gsmoove23]

What I'm saying is there are quite alot of important studies being carried out in genetic trends, genetic influence on personality and so on, which I am in no way against. Tying genetic studies to superficial genetic difference like skin-tone is limiting and obscures wider trends.

[MikeH]

Yep.

[TheStinger]

maybe people should be forced to go through a classification process to determine theri racial origin, and then we can work out which ones should go to the camps

[gsmoove23]

and what about people who are of the great yellow banana...

[MikeH]

Originally posted by TheStinger
maybe people should be forced to go through a classification process to determine theri racial origin, and then we can work out which ones should go to the camps

Good idea. We could make people wear badges to signify what origin they were to make the police be able to tell which ones they should be searching.

Oh and of course, we would only let the most trustworthy and fair racial groups be in the police.

[TheStinger]

Originally posted by MikeH



Good idea. We could make people wear badges to signify what origin they were to make the police be able to tell which ones they should be searching.

Oh and of course, we would only let the most trustworthy and fair racial groups be in the police.

And people could be encouraged to report their neighbours who they suspected of having the wrong parents.

[TheStinger]

Of course nothing like any of this could happen

[gsmoove23]

Hey can read-heads be at the top this time, I'd really like to be a part of the master race this time instead of an accepted off-shoot.

[gsmoove23]

Freckles, a sure sign of racial purity.

[TheStinger]

left handed people really should be rounded up

[gsmoove23]

Whoa... hold on. I'm sensing that their is something about your racial make-up that deserves being rounded up and shot(hunt and pecks sentence with left hand).

[MikeH]

Make him use the right handed scissors!

[tinyp3nis]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


I am not positing that genes have anything to do with my exmples. I am positing the opposite, they have almost nothing to do with it. Over time, the superior genes should have shown themselves by making one race or the other dominent more often than another. Since that didn't happen, we are left to conclude that none of the "races" of humanity are superior to one another.

So far, what we have is, "well, there are visual variations among the 'races,' so there may or must be differences in other areas as well." The problem is, if those differences exist, why haven't they yet been detected? Disease resistance is the only unseen difference that scientists can show at this point. Changes only spread through a population when the lack of that mutation causes individuals to be less able to pass on their genes.

You have to explain why the environment in which white people evolved necessarily made us more intelligent than Africans. Why would people of average intelligence be unable to survive the Central Asian steppes? Certainly, it's a harsh environment, but no more so than many other parts of the world. What is special about that area that it required even greater intelligence to survive than say, the SouthWestern US?

Then, you need to explain why these supposedly superior peoples took so much longer to develop civilization (and couldn't hold onto it when they conquered it).

What's all this? Just when I said the reasons cannot be singled out in your examples, you still try to.

[gsmoove23]

So it is settled, red-headed, left-handed freckled people will be the master race. Righties rights will be protected yet they will be required to wear right gloves as to be easily recognized so their rights may be protected.

[gsmoove23]

heterosexuality will be tolerated as well, just don't flaunt it.