Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tyrranny or Anarchy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    I though we were discussing anarchy, not anarchism...
    There's no difference. "Anarchy" has been hijacked by the authorities (it used to be used often) as a synonomy for "chaos," so anarchists generally prefer using the word anarchism.
    "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
    -Bokonon

    Comment


    • #47
      I thought it was a synonym for chaos. It certainly seems to have been used this way in the first post.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Ramo
        Libertarian socialism, to put it succintly.
        If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

        Comment


        • #49
          There's nothing funny about it. Y'all were the splitters. Libertarianism originally meant anarchism.
          "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
          -Bokonon

          Comment


          • #50
            I can start calling my TV a telephone and then laugh at everyone who still calls it a TV, it doesn't make it a telephone.

            Socialism is impossible without central planning. That's the whole idea.
            If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

            Comment


            • #51
              I thought it was a synonym for chaos.
              It's interesting how authoritarianism changes language. Anarchism was heavily criminalized in the US early in the century, and "anarchy" changes to "chaos."

              It certainly seems to have been used this way in the first post.
              Then he should've used a more appropriate description for what he wanted to refer to, like feudalism.
              "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
              -Bokonon

              Comment


              • #52
                No. Libertarianism came from a group championing individual rights. Socialism is the express idea of denying all individual rights.

                Who do mean by "y'all?" The entire Libertarian party?!
                If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

                Comment


                • #53
                  I can start calling my TV a telephone and then laugh at everyone who still calls it a TV, it doesn't make it a telephone.
                  People generally have no idea about political history. Ask your average person what a fascist is. Ask him what a classical liberal is. Just because he's ignorant doesn't make him right.

                  Socialism is impossible without central planning. That's the whole idea.
                  Socialism is the worker control of means of production. That's the whole idea.
                  "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                  -Bokonon

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Then he should've used a more appropriate description for what he wanted to refer to, like feudalism.
                    Or just chaos, though that's likely to evolve into feudalism eventually (if the society actually survives, that is).

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      No. Libertarianism came from a group championing individual rights.
                      The phrase libertarianism originated in the 19th century as a synonym to anarchism. I can guarantee you that no one meant capitalism by that phrase in 1850.

                      Socialism is the express idea of denying all individual rights.
                      Socialism is about worker liberty. It's true some variants of socialism don't hold to that ideal, but that irrelevent. I'm referring to socialism as it pertains to anarchism.

                      Who do mean by "y'all?" The entire Libertarian party?!
                      Yep.
                      "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                      -Bokonon

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Ramo, if you insist on using different definitions than what is generally accepted, you're just going to confuse the normal people.

                        I don't want to get into a Socialism/Capitalism fight and I don't want to get into a semantics argument. I think you very well aware of what anarchy is considered to mean. It is the absence of government. The court system is a part of government. The police are a part of government. You can say, No no, I wouldn't call it government. Well good for you....
                        If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Libertarianism now means the combination of capitalism and individual social rights. And just like you can't go around using "liberal" as it was once used, you can't go back 150 years in the meaning of libertarianism. It means what it means now. Sorry if it makes you sad. You know what it means now, and you are purposely trying to stir things up and cause confusion...
                          If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            If I insist on using bastardized definitions for everything, people just get confused. Like how people associate 20th centurly liberalism with 19th century liberalism. If I don't insist on using the right definition, my political movement would be tarred as "chaos."

                            I don't want to get into a Socialism/Capitalism fight
                            I'm just pointing out socialism is about worker control, not state control. That's a very important distinction.
                            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                            -Bokonon

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Libertarianism now means the combination of capitalism and individual social rights.
                              In the US, that's true. In most of the rest of the world, libertarianism is associated with anarchism.
                              "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                              -Bokonon

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Fine. I will continue to view communism and socialism in the same light because group control is group control. I don't care what you call your group.
                                If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X