Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

International creationism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • International creationism

    The intent of this thread is not, repeat not, to discuss evolution vs. creationism. As far as I am concerned, creationists have consistently been nothing but wrong and in fact pose a threat to the education of children and to the well-being of those who would expose the lies of creationists. Rather, I'm looking to find out how common creationism is in countries outside the United States, in the experiences of the readers of this forum.

    I've often heard that creationism was only common in the United States and I personally knew several creationists. However, I recently moved to Australia and have met several people who question evolution. I was upset to learn that creationists have had notable success in Queensland, even winning a court battle to allow creation "science" to be taught in school. I was futher dismayed to read about Ian Pilcher, an Australian professor who went bankrupt due to a lawsuit brought against him by a creationist group. (Australia has really bad defamation laws IMO.) Pilcher also claims to have received death threats from the creationists. The Australian creationist movement is said to have been imported from the United States, suggesting to me that American fundamentalist groups pose an international threat.

    I also recall that quite recently there was a controversy in Britain when the media publicized that Emmanuel College was teaching creationism in science class.

    I wish to make clear that I am an US citizen and consider myself a patriot, although I dislike certain customs common to my fellow citizens. I also have no problem with teaching origin myths in public school so long as it is in a religion or literature class.

    My questions are:

    Have you seen any signs of creationism (aka creation science aka intelligent design) gaining currency in countries other than the United States? Are creationist magazines sold or given away in your country? Have creationist organizations held lectures (often, as I understand it, under the pretence of discussing evolutionary theory) or rallies? Have creationists pressured schools in your country to include creationism in science classes or to put disclaimers in biology texts?

    Any comments on the topic (so long as they are not attacks on evolution, take those to another thread or better yet go read a book by, say, Stephen Jay Gould) would be appreciated.

    Thank you for reading.
    Above all, avoid zeal. --Tallyrand.

  • #2
    AFAIK, creationism has always been on the lunatic fringe here. A few years ago Henry Morris of ICR came over here to speak on "Scientific Creationism." As other creationists, he couldn't answer my stumper questions.

    I think a more interesting approach is this. Find out what lies ICR (or other creationist organisations) keeps publishing in their handouts or books even after they have been refuted. Then you will be ready to face them wherever they surface.
    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

    Comment


    • #3
      Creationism has been on the fringe for the most part, the ID movement however, has been gaining quite a bit of steam with respectable scientists.
      BTW, I urge you to pick up a book by Michael J. Behe or William Dembski instead of formulating silly trolls such as these. While creationists do pose a threat to the education system it is a threat several orders of magnitude less than strangehold that evolutionists have on the education system. Say what you will about creationists, but evolutionists have had their dogma so throughly engrained into science textbooks that any thoughtful dialogue on some of the, shall we say, "inadaqucies" of evolution is impossible.
      Last edited by monkspider; October 28, 2002, 05:13.
      http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Behe's "Irreducible Complexity" has been met head-on right here (particularly this article, extremely informative).

        The talks.origin archives also have articles refuting both.

        Intelligent Design is just Creationism by another name.
        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

        Comment


        • #5
          The intent of this thread is not, repeat not, to discuss evolution vs. creationism. As far as I am concerned, creationists have consistently been nothing but wrong and in fact pose a threat to the education of children and to the well-being of those who would expose the lies of creationists.


          quiet a pathatic opening to a thread that's not about creationism / evolutionism. First you speak out your opinion about creationism in a very extreme way, and then you suspect us to not focus on it.

          Eventhough your subject is interesting,
          the way you start it makes it obviously that you can only be putted into the 'fanatic evolutionists' corner, where all the evo-fundamentalists are having a happy hour.

          Have a great time mr. superior.
          Formerly known as "CyberShy"
          Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori

          Comment


          • #6
            I agree completely Cyber. Any attempt to start a decent conversation on the matter in such a manner is disingenous at best. I have no problem with evolution being taught in schools, there probably is a tidbit of wisdom or two to be learned once you get past all the force-fed dogma. The problem is that the current evolutionary paradigm presented in common textbooks is inherently faulty, and is often feeding children with misleading or simply untrue information.
            The best thing I can say about the current evolution movement is that some aspects of it are perhaps well-meaning (the pursuit for knowledge of human origins and so forth), but it is ultimately very intellectually dishonest.
            http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Haven't noticed anything about Creationism here. It seems to be mostly limited to the nutty fringe evangelists that have little traction in Austria (or Europe, for that matter).

              Comment


              • #8
                UR: At least the first link you post seemed to be more interested in strawmen and fallacious arguements of all sorts than any kind of a honest attempt at reconciling irreducible complexity with their current model of Darwinism. I'll try to read some of the other stuff tommorrow.
                http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

                Comment


                • #9
                  It seems to be mostly limited to the nutty fringe evangelists that have little traction in Austria (or Europe, for that matter).


                  cool, you must be an arier as well!
                  You're a blond, blue eyes, and you feel superior as well?

                  In the middle ages the majorigy teached a flat earth, and everybody who said something else was concidered to be a fool. The most educated people said the earth was flat. And the inquisition killed everybody who thought different.

                  Pherhaps in 400 years people will laugh about those foolish 20th and 21th centuries, in which the most educated people and the big mass all believed in evolution.

                  And yes, in the middle ages most people thought that would never happen as well.
                  You can live up to the education system of the day, that's no problem. But please stop being that arrogant, and feeling that superior.
                  Formerly known as "CyberShy"
                  Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by monkspider
                    I agree completely Cyber. Any attempt to start a decent conversation on the matter in such a manner is disingenous at best.
                    You have both missed the point completely. He is not interested in discussing Creationism. He has merely stated his own position on it. If you don't like it, start your own thread on "Internationl evolution."
                    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Elequently stated Cyber.
                      http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Sorry, I don't do copycat threads UR.

                        For the record, I used to be a most-outspoken proponent of evolution. In fact, in the past, I have written several school papers defending it. Over time though, I have simply found that the arguements against the current evolutionary model more convincing than those for it. So don't dismiss all of us who no longer support the current evolutionary model as "nutty loonybins".
                        http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          You have both missed the point completely. He is not interested in discussing Creationism. He has merely stated his own position on it. If you don't like it, start your own thread on "Internationl evolution."


                          If he doesn't want to discuss it (which I understood perfectly) he should not write down his own opinion that arrogantly in the opening message.

                          Eventhough you're on his side, it wouldn't hurt you to agree with that. Like I agree with you if people like civnation are completely missing the issue. It would help me very well to take you more serious, if you can judge people on your own side as well. Think about that UR.
                          Formerly known as "CyberShy"
                          Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by monkspider
                            UR: At least the first link you post seemed to be more interested in strawmen and fallacious arguements of all sorts than any kind of a honest attempt at reconciling irreducible complexity with their current model of Darwinism.
                            The first link consists of a condensed version of "why there is no such thing as 'irreducible complexity" and a lot of other links.

                            IMO, Behe's argument has been decisively refuted. He simply ignores the fact that evolution makes do with existing systems, finding new uses for them.

                            For example, I don't have to start with a mouse trap. I can start with a block of wood, a spring, the catch, and the metal wire. No, I don't have a mouse trap, but the parts are there. When the need of a mouse trap arises, I can press all the parts together for a mouse trap. This is evolution.
                            (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                            (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                            (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              In Sweden we have a only a few creationists. Mostly Jehova's Witnesses and other interesting sects
                              The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X